logo

Unique Factorization Domain 📂Abstract Algebra

Unique Factorization Domain

Definitions 1

  1. A domain DD, that is neither 00 nor a field, in which every element (except for 0 and units) has a unique factorization into irreducible elements is said to be a Unique Factorization Domain.
  2. In a Unique Factorization Domain DD, for a1,,ana_{1} , \cdots , a_{n} if daid \mid a_{i} and every divisor of aia_{i} divides dd, then dd is called the Greatest Common Divisor of a1,,ana_{1} , \cdots , a_{n}, denoted by gcd\gcd.
  3. Let a polynomial in a Unique Factorization Domain DD be denoted by f(x):=a0+a1x++anxnf(x) := a_{0} + a_{1} x + \cdots + a_{n} x^{n}. If gcd(a0,a1,,an)=1\gcd ( a_{0} , a_{1} , \cdots , a_{n} ) = 1, then f(x)D[x]f(x) \in D [ x ] is said to be Primitive.

  • A unit is the identity element 11 with respect to multiplication, and a field element is an element that has a multiplicative inverse.

Theorems 2

  • [1]: Every PID is a UFD.
  • [2] Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic: Z\mathbb{Z} is a UFD.
  • [3] Gauss’s Lemma: If DD is a UFD, then the product of primitive polynomials in D[x]D [ x ] is also primitive.
  • [4]: If DD is a UFD, then D[x]D [ x ] is also a UFD.
  • [5]: If FF is a field, then F[x1,,xn]F[ x_{1} , \cdots , x_{n} ] is a UFD.

Explanation

The term “Unique Factorization Domain” is often shortened to UFD because it’s quite lengthy.

UFD

The existence of a finite factorization of elements means that a given element can be represented as a product of a finite number of irreducible elements. The utility of UFDs lies in the ability to decompose larger objects into more manageable pieces. Even if we cannot specifically identify these components in all cases, the mere existence of such factorization is greatly helpful. It makes the domain conform to our “common sense” of computation.

There are many examples of UFDs. For instance, as mentioned in Theorem [2], the ring of integers Z\mathbb{Z} is one. However, consider a simple extension field Z(5)\mathbb{Z} ( \sqrt{ - 5 } ) obtained by adding 5\sqrt{-5} to the ring of integers. Here, while 21Z(5)21 \in \mathbb{Z} ( \sqrt{ - 5 } ) has a prime factorization 21=3721 = 3 \cdot 7, 21=(1+25)(125)21 = ( 1 + 2 \sqrt{-5}) ( 1 - 2 \sqrt{-5}) is also possible making the factorization not unique, and we can easily verify that Z(5)\mathbb{Z} ( \sqrt{ - 5 } ) is not a Unique Factorization Domain.

Primitive Function?

Being primitive in this context has nothing to do with the notion of a primitive function in calculus, which refers to not being able to factor out coefficients uniformly across the polynomial, unlike being able to encapsulate (3x2+6x+3)Z[x](3 x^2 + 6 x + 3) \in \mathbb{Z} [ x ] as 3(x2+2x+1)3 ( x^2 + 2x + 1).

Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic

Unlike the statement in number theory, the fact that the ring of integers Z\mathbb{Z} is a UFD is summarized here. Obviously, a myriad of concepts are mobilized for this declaration, but higher-level number theory often expresses such ideas in algebraic terminologies, making the study of algebra indispensable. Even if one does not major in algebra, lacking knowledge in it is like being in the dark.

Gauss’s Lemma

Gauss’s Lemma is more interesting than one might think. For example, considering (5x+1),(2x2+3x+1)Z[x](5x + 1) , (2x^2 + 3x + 1) \in \mathbb{Z} [ x ], its product is (10x3+17x2+8x+1)( 10 x^3 + 17 x^2 + 8 x + 1 ), which can’t obviously be factored by some greatest common divisor aZa \in \mathbb{Z}. One might expect to stumble upon at least one counter-example eventually, but thanks to Gauss’s Lemma, such futile efforts are unnecessary.

Proof

[1]

Part 1. Existence

If DD is a PID, then dDd \in D can be expressed as a finite product of irreducible elements p1,,prp_{1} , \cdots , p_{r}, like so a=p1pra = p_{1} \cdots p_{r}.


Part 2. Uniqueness

Suppose there are other irreducible elements q1,,qsq_{1} , \cdots , q_{s} such that a=q1qsa = q_{1} \cdots q_{s} is also possible.

Since irreducible elements in a PID are prime, for some 1js1 \le j \le s, p1qjp_{1} \mid q_{j} must hold. p1p2pr=p1u1q2qs p_{1} p_{2} \cdots p_{r} = p_{1} u_{1} q_{2} \cdots q_{s} Cancelling p1p_{1} from both sides gives p2pr=u1q2qs p_{2} \cdots p_{r} = u_{1} q_{2} \cdots q_{s} Repeatedly applying the same logic up to i=ri=r yields 1=u1urqr+1qs 1 = u_{1} \cdots u_{r} q_{r+1} \cdots q_{s} Since qr+1qsq_{r+1} \cdots q_{s} is irreducible, it must divide r=sr=s.

[2]

Every ideal of Z\mathbb{Z} is of the form <n>=nZ\left< n \right> = n \mathbb{Z}, making it a PID, and by Theorem [1], a UFD.

[3]

f(x):=a0+a1x++anxng(x):=b0+b1x++bmxm \begin{align*} f(x) &:= a_{0} + a_{1} x + \cdots + a_{n} x^n \\ g(x) &:= b_{0} + b_{1} x + \cdots + b_{m} x^m \end{align*} Consider primitive polynomials f(x),g(x)D[x]f(x) , g(x) \in D[x] as shown above.

Let pDp \in D be an irreducible element.

  • Since f(x)f(x) is primitive, gcd(a0,,an)=1\gcd ( a_{0} , \cdots , a_{n} ) = 1, and pp can’t divide all of a0,,ana_{0} , \cdots , a_{n}. Let the first coefficient that pp fails to divide among those be ara_{r}.
  • Similarly, since g(x)g(x) is primitive, gcd(b0,,bm)=1\gcd ( b_{0} , \cdots , b_{m} ) = 1, and pp can’t divide all of b0,,bmb_{0} , \cdots , b_{m}. Let the first coefficient that pp fails to divide among those be bsb_{s}.

Then the coefficient of the (r+s)( r + s) term of f(x)g(x)f(x)g(x) is cr+s=(a0br+s++ar1bs+1)+arbs+(ar+1bs1++ar+sb0) c_{r+s} = ( a_{0} b_{r+s} + \cdots + a_{r-1} b_{s+1} ) + a_{r} b_{s} + ( a_{r+1} b_{s-1} + \cdots + a_{r+s} b_{0} ) And by definition,

  • for ara_{r}: p(a0br+s++ar1bs+1) p \mid ( a_{0} b_{r+s} + \cdots + a_{r-1} b_{s+1} )
  • for bsb_{s}: p(ar+1bs1++ar+sb0) p \mid ( a_{r+1} b_{s-1} + \cdots + a_{r+s} b_{0} )

However, since parbsp \nmid a_{r} b_{s}, the given pp can’t divide f(x)g(x)f(x) g(x). The same applies to all irreducible elements, making f(x)g(x)f(x) g(x) primitive.

[4]

Let the degree of f(x)D[x]f(x) \in D[x] be nn.

Then, f(x)f(x) can be factored into f(x)=g1(x)gr(x)) f (x) = g_{1} (x) \cdots g_{r} (x)) And for each i=1,,ri = 1 , \cdots , r, the factors can be expressed as the product of a primitive function hi(x)D[x]h_{i} (x) \in D[x] and ciDc_{i} \in D, as in gi(x)=cihi(x) g_{i} (x) = c_{i} h_{i} (x) This cic_{i} is called the Content of gi(x)g_{i} (x), leading to f(x)=c1h1(x)crhr(x) f(x) = c_{1} h_{1} (x) \cdots c_{r} h_{r} (x) Since the content is unique for given gi(x)g_{i} (x) and hi(x)h_{i} (x), the factorization of f(x)f(x) is unique disregarding the order and scalar multiplication of factors.

[5]

Factorization of Polynomials:

  • [2]: If FF is a field, all non-constant polynomials f(x)F[x]f(x) \in F [ x ] can be factored into irreducible elements, and this factorization is unique.

By the definition of UFD, F[x1]F [x_{1} ] is a UFD, and by Theorem [4], F[x1,x2]F [ x_{1} , x_{2} ] is also a UFD. Repeating this for a finite number of x3,,xnx_{3} , \cdots , x_{n} leads to the conclusion that F[x1,,xn]F[ x_{1} , \cdots , x_{n} ] is a UFD.

See Also


  1. Fraleigh. (2003). A first course in abstract algebra(7th Edition): p390, 395~396. ↩︎

  2. Fraleigh. (2003). A first course in abstract algebra(7th Edition): p394~399. ↩︎