logo

Proof of Cauchy's Theorem in Complex Analysis 📂Complex Anaylsis

Proof of Cauchy's Theorem in Complex Analysis

Theorem 1

Let’s assume that C\mathscr{C} is a simple closed path and f:ACCf: A \subseteq \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C} is analytic in its interior and ff ' is continuous. Then, Cf(z)dz=0 \int_{\mathscr{C}} f(z) dz = 0

Proof

For atba \le t \le b, z(t)=x(t)+iy(t)f(z)=u(x,y)+iv(x,y) z(t) = x(t) + i y(t) \\ f(z) = u(x,y) + i v(x,y) then since dzdt=x+iy\displaystyle {{dz} \over {dt}} = x ' + i y ', f(z)dz=f(z)(x+iy)dt=(u+iv)(x+iy)dt=(uxvy)+i(vx+uy)dt \begin{align*} f(z)dz =& f(z) ( x ' + i y ' ) dt \\ =& (u + i v ) ( x ' + i y ' ) dt \\ =& (u x ' - v y ' ) + i (v x ' + u y ' ) dt \end{align*} and x=dxdt\displaystyle x ' = {{dx} \over {dt}} and also because y=dydt\displaystyle y ' = {{dy} \over {dt}}, Cf(z)dz=ab(uxvy)dt+iab(vx+uy)dt=C(udxvdy)+iC(vdx+udy) \begin{align*} \int_{\mathscr{C}} f(z) dz =& \int_{a}^{b} (u x ' - v y ' ) dt + i \int_{a}^{b} (v x ' + u y ' ) dt \\ =& \int_{\mathscr{C}} (u dx - v dy ) + i \int_{\mathscr{C}} (v dx + u dy) \end{align*} here the condition that the derivative is continuous is used.

Green’s theorem: If P,QP,Q is continuous and its derivative is also continuous, then C(Pdx+Qdy)=S(QxPy)dxdy\int_{\mathscr{C}} (Pdx + Qdy) = \iint_{S} (Q_{x} - P_{y}) dx dy

According to Green’s theorem, Cf(z)dz=S(vx+uy)dxdy+iS(uxvy)dxdy \int_{\mathscr{C}} f(z) dz = - \iint_{S} (v_x + u_y) dxdy + i \iint_{S} (u_x - v_y) dxdy Meanwhile, u,vu,v are solutions satisfying the Cauchy-Riemann equations, so uy=vxu_y = -v_x and ux=vyu_x = v_y. Hence, Cf(z)dz=0 \int_{\mathscr{C}} f(z) dz = 0

Description

This means that under certain conditions, it’s not necessary to calculate the definite integral at all. Cauchy is known as the ‘father of analysis’, and this theorem is extremely important, just as his name alone indicates. As you can see, fulfilling the conditions of function ff is not that difficult, so it can be utilized in many places.

It’s not only practical but also remarkably simple, so you can even appreciate the mathematical beauty.

While dealing with derivatives and integrals, a rough interpretation of analysis was used. It’s synonymous in result, but rigorously it’s an incorrect process, so caution is needed.

I introduce another useful theorem without proof.

Generalization

The Cauchy-Goursat Theorem

In a simply connected region R\mathscr{R}, if ff is analytic, for a simple closed path C\mathscr{C} in the R\mathscr{R} interior, Cf(z)dz=0 \int_{\mathscr{C}} f(z) dz = 0


The French mathematician Goursat generalized this by eliminating the condition on the derivative of ff. It’s a fact that it is more useful than Cauchy’s theorem, so make sure to remember it.

See also


  1. Osborne (1999). Complex variables and their applications: p82. ↩︎