logo

Linear Transformation: Kernel and Range 📂Linear Algebra

Linear Transformation: Kernel and Range

Definition1

Let’s say T:VWT : V \to W is a linear transformation. The set of elements of VV that are mapped to 0\mathbf{0} by TT is called the kernel or null space, and is denoted as follows.

ker(T)=N(T):={vV:T(v)=0} \text{ker}(T) = N(T) := \left\{ \mathbf{v} \in V : T( \mathbf{v} ) = \mathbf{0} \right\}

The set of images under vV\mathbf{v} \in V by TT is called the range or image of TT, and is denoted as follows.

R(T):={T(v):vV} R(T) := \left\{ T(\mathbf{v}) : \forall \mathbf{v} \in V \right\}

Explanation

If T:VWT : V \to W is a linear transformation and V,WV, W is finite-dimensional, TT is essentially the same as a matrix, and N(T)N(T) is the null space of the matrix representing TT.

Theorem

Let’s consider T:VWT : V \to W to be a linear transformation. Then,

  • (a) The kernel of TT is a subspace of VV.
  • (b) The range of TT is a subspace of WW.

Proof

To show that it’s a subspace, we need to prove that it’s nonempty, and closed under addition and scalar multiplication.


(a)

If TT is a linear transformation, then according to T(0)=0T(\mathbf{0})=\mathbf{0}, N(T)N(T) is not empty. Now, let v1,v2N(T)\mathbf{v}_{1}, \mathbf{v}_{2} \in N(T) and consider kk to be any scalar. Then, the following holds.

T(v1+v2)=T(v1)+T(v2)=0+0=0T(kv1)=kT(v1)=k0=0 \begin{align*} T( \mathbf{v}_{1} + \mathbf{v}_{2} ) &= T(\mathbf{v}_{1}) + T(\mathbf{v}_{2}) = \mathbf{0} + \mathbf{0} = \mathbf{0} \\ T( k\mathbf{v}_{1}) &= kT(\mathbf{v}_{1}) = k\mathbf{0} = \mathbf{0} \end{align*}

Hence, N(T)N(T) is a subspace of VV.

(b)

If TT is a linear transformation, then, as per T(0)=0T(\mathbf{0})=\mathbf{0}, R(T)R(T) is not empty. Now, let w1,w2R(T)\mathbf{w}_{1}, \mathbf{w}_{2} \in R(T) and consider kk to be any scalar. Then, it suffices to show that there exists a,bV\mathbf{a}, \mathbf{b} \in V that satisfies the following.

T(a)=w1+w2andT(b)=kw1 T(\mathbf{a}) = \mathbf{w}_{1} + \mathbf{w}_{2} \quad \text{and} \quad T(\mathbf{b}) = k\mathbf{w}_{1}

But the statement w1,w2R(T)\mathbf{w}_{1}, \mathbf{w}_{2} \in R(T) means that there exists v1,v2V\mathbf{v}_{1}, \mathbf{v}_{2} \in V that satisfies the following.

T(v1)=w1andT(v2)=w2 T(\mathbf{v}_{1}) = \mathbf{w}_{1} \quad \text{and} \quad T(\mathbf{v}_{2}) = \mathbf{w}_{2}

Therefore, the following equation holds.

w1+w2=T(v1)+T(v2)=T(v1+v2)=T(a)kw1=kT(v1)=T(kv1)=T(b) \begin{align*} \mathbf{w}_{1} + \mathbf{w}_{2} &= T(\mathbf{v}_{1}) + T(\mathbf{v}_{2}) = T(\mathbf{v}_{1} + \mathbf{v}_{2}) = T(\mathbf{a}) \\ k\mathbf{w}_{1} &= kT(\mathbf{v}_{1}) = T(k\mathbf{v}_{1})= T(\mathbf{b}) \end{align*}

Hence, R(T)R(T) is a subspace of WW.


  1. Howard Anton, Elementary Linear Algebra: Aplications Version (12th Edition, 2019), p455-456 ↩︎