logo

Integration of Multivariable Functions 📂Vector Analysis

Integration of Multivariable Functions

Definition1

Let IkI^{k} be a k-cell, and assume xIk\mathbf{x} \in I^{k}.

x=(x1,,xk),aixibi(i=1,,k) \mathbf{x} = (x_{1},\dots,x_{k}),\quad a_{i} \le x_{i} \le b_{i} (i=1,\dots,k)

Suppose f:IkRf: I^{k} \to \mathbb{R} is continuous. Then, since it is integrable, let us set it as f=fkf=f_{k}, and define fk1:Ik1Rf_{k-1} : I^{k-1} \to \mathbb{R} as follows:

fk1(x1,,xk1)=akbkfk(x1,,xk)dxk f_{k-1} (x_{1}, \dots, x_{k-1}) = \int_{a_{k}}^{b_{k}} f_{k}(x_{1}, \dots, x_{k}) dx_{k}

Then, by the Leibniz Rule, fk1f_{k-1} is continuous in Ik1I^{k-1}. Repeating this process kk times yields the constant f0Rf_{0}\in \mathbb{R}. This is called the integral of ff over IkI^{k}, and is denoted as follows:

Ikf(x)dxorIkf \begin{equation} \int_{I^{k}} f(\mathbf{x}) d\mathbf{x} \quad \text{or} \quad \int_{I^{k}}f \label{eq1} \end{equation}

Explanation

Such a definition of integration might seem to depend on the order of integration. However, in reality, the integral value of ff does not depend on the order of integration.

Theorem

Let (eq1)\eqref{eq1} be L(f)L(f). Let another integral of some ff with a different order of integration be L(f)L^{\prime}(f). Then, for all ff that are continuous in IkI^{k}, the following holds:

L(f)=L(f) L(f) = L^{\prime}(f)

Proof

Let us set the function hh as follows:

h(x)=h1(x1)h2(x2)hk(xk),hj\href h(\mathbf{x}) = h_{1}(x_{1}) h_{2}(x_{2}) \cdots h_{k}(x_{k}),\quad h_{j}\in \href{https://freshrimpsushi.github.io/posts/support-and-classes-of-continuous-functions/}{C([a_{j},b_{j}])}

Then, the following holds:

L(h)=i=1kaibihi(xi)dxi=L(h) L(h) = \prod \limits_{i=1}^{k} \int_{a_{i}}^{b_{i}}h_{i}(x_{i})dx_{i} = L^{\prime}(h)

Now, let A\mathscr{A} be the set of all finite sums of such hhs.

A={all of finite sums of such functions h} \mathscr{A} = \left\{ \text{all of finite sums of such functions h} \right\}

Since integration is linear, the following holds:

L(g)=L(g),gA L(g) = L^{\prime}(g),\quad \forall g\in \mathscr{A}

Furthermore, A\mathscr{A} becomes an algebra over IkI^{k}.

Algebra

The set of functions A\mathscr{A} is called an algebra if it satisfies the following for all f,gAf,g \in \mathscr{A} and the constant cc:

  • f+gAf + g \in \mathscr{A}
  • fgAfg \in \mathscr{A}
  • cfAcf \in \mathscr{A}

Now, by applying the Stone-Weierstrass Theorem, we obtain the following result:

  • Let’s say V=i=1k(biai)V= \prod \limits_{i=1}^{k}(b_{i} - a_{i}). If fC(Ik)f \in C(I^{k}) and ε>0\varepsilon >0 are given, then there exists gAg\in \mathscr{A} that satisfies the following: fg<εV \| f - g \| < \dfrac{\varepsilon}{V} In this case, the norm is given as f=maxf\| f \| = \max | f |.

Then, the following inequality holds:

L(fg)L(maxfg)=fgV<εL(fg)L(maxfg)=fgV<ε \begin{align*} |L(f-g)| &\le L(\max|f-g|) = \| f-g \| V < \varepsilon \\ |L^{\prime}(f-g)| &\le L^{\prime}(\max|f-g|) = \| f-g \| V < \varepsilon \end{align*}

Also, the following equation holds:

L(f)L(f)=L(f)L(g)+L(g)L(f)=L(fg)+L(gf) L(f) - L^{\prime}(f) = L(f) - L(g) + L^{\prime}(g) - L(f) = L(f-g) + L^{\prime}(g-f)

Therefore, we obtain the following equation:

L(f)L(f)=L(fg)+L(gf)<2ε | L(f) - L^{\prime}(f) | = | L(f-g) + L^{\prime}(g-f) | < 2\varepsilon

Since this is true for all ε\varepsilon, we obtain the following:

L(f)=L(f) L(f) = L^{\prime}(f)


  1. Walter Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis (3rd Edition, 1976), p245-246 ↩︎