logo

Convolution of Distributions, Distributions as Functions Defined on Real Numbers 📂Distribution Theory

Convolution of Distributions, Distributions as Functions Defined on Real Numbers

Buildup1

The goal of distribution theory is to rigorously define entities like the naively defined Dirac delta function in mathematical terms. As such, it becomes necessary to treat distributions, defined in the function space, as functions defined over the real number space. Initially, let’s consider how the differentiation, translation, etc., of distributions have been defined.

Since the domain of a distribution is a function space, it is thought that actions such as differentiation cannot be defined in the traditional sense. Instead, these actions are considered to be performed on test functions. Similarly, one aims to define the convolution of a distribution and a test function. Let’s assume we have a locally integrable function uu and its corresponding regular distribution TuT_{u}. The convolution of uu and a test function ϕ\phi is as follows.

uϕ(x)=u(y)ϕ(xy)dy,x,yRn u \ast \phi (\mathbf{x}) =\int u(\mathbf{y})\phi (\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y})d\mathbf{y},\quad \mathbf{x},\mathbf{y}\in \mathbb{R}^{n}

Since one cannot convolute TuT_{u} and ϕ\phi, let’s define the convolution of TuT_{u} and ϕ\phi as the convolution of uu and ϕ\phi corresponding to TuT_{u}.

Tuϕ(x):=u(y)ϕ(xy)dy=uϕ(x) T_{u} \ast \phi (\mathbf{x}):=\int u(\mathbf{y})\phi (\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y})d\mathbf{y}=u\ast \phi (\mathbf{x})

However, if for any function ff, it is said that f~(y)=f(y)\tilde{f}(y)=f(-y), fx(y)=f(yx)f_{x}(y)=f(y-x), then the following holds.

f~x(y)=f~(yx)=f(xy) \tilde{f}_{x}(y)=\tilde{f}(y-x)=f(x-y)

Therefore, TuϕT_{u} \ast \phi can be denoted as follows.

Tuϕ(x):=u(y)ϕ~x(y)dy=Tu(ϕ~x) T_{u}\ast \phi (\mathbf{x}):=\int u(\mathbf{y})\tilde{\phi}_{\mathbf{x}}(\mathbf{y})d\mathbf{y}=T_{u}(\tilde{\phi}_{\mathbf{x}})

Thus, the convolution of a distribution and a test function is finally defined as follows.

Definition

Let TT be a distribution and ϕ\phi be a test function. The convolution of TT and ϕ\phi is defined as follows.

Tϕ(x):=T(ϕ~x)=T(ϕ(x)) T \ast \phi (\mathbf{x}) :=T(\tilde{\phi}_{\mathbf{x}})=T(\phi (\mathbf{x}-\cdot))

Explanation

Due to such a definition, the distribution TT, whose domain is the function space, can be thought of as being defined over the real space R\mathbb{R}. Hence, it becomes possible to talk about continuity, differentiation, etc., in the classical sense. In fact, the following theorem holds.

Theorem

Let TT be a distribution, ϕ\phi be a test function. Then, the following holds.

TϕCandα(Tϕ)=Tαϕ T\ast \phi \in C^{\infty} \quad \text{and} \quad \partial^{\alpha}(T\ast \phi)=T\ast \partial^{\alpha}\phi

Proof

For simplification, let’s assume it’s one-dimensional. For some test function ϕ\phi, there exists r>0r>0 such that the following formula holds.

suppϕ[r,r] \mathrm{supp}\phi \subset [-r,r]

Additionally, if some function f:RCf :\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{C} is defined by f(y)=ϕ(x+hy)f(y)=\phi (x+h-y) with respect to xC\left| x \right| \le C , h1\left| h \right| \le 1, then the following formula applies.

suppf[R,R],R=r+C+1 \mathrm{supp}f \subset [-R,R],\quad R=r+C+1

Now, let’s define ψ\psi and Ψ\Psi as follows.

ψx,h(y)= ϕ(x+hy)ϕ(xy)Ψx,h(y)= ϕ(x+hy)ϕ(xy)hϕ(xy) \begin{align*} \psi_{x,h}(y) =&\ \phi (x+h-y)-\phi (x-y) \\ \Psi_{x,h}(y) =&\ \frac{\phi (x+h-y)-\phi (x-y) }{h}-\phi^{\prime}(x-y) \end{align*}

Then, the following holds.

suppψx,h[R,R]suppΨx,h[R,R] \begin{align*} \mathrm{supp} \psi_{x,h} &\subset [-R,R] \\ \mathrm{supp} \Psi_{x,h}&\subset[-R,R] \end{align*}

Furthermore, since ϕ\phi is a test function, ψx,h\psi_{x,h}, Ψx,h\Psi_{x,h} are differentiable, and ψx,h\psi_{x,h}, Ψx,h\Psi_{x,h} along with their derivatives converge uniformly to 00 when h0h \to 0. Therefore, by the continuity condition of distributions, the following formula holds.

limh0[(Tϕ)(x+h)(Tϕ)(x)]= limh0[T(ϕ~x+h)T(ϕ~x)]= limh0T(ϕ~x+hϕ~x)= limh0T(ψx,h)= T(0)= 0 \begin{align*} \lim \limits_{h\to 0} \big[ \left( T \ast \phi \right)(x+h)- (T\ast \phi)(x) \big] =&\ \lim \limits_{h\to 0} \big[ T(\tilde{\phi}_{x+h}) -T(\tilde{\phi}_{x}) \big] \\ =&\ \lim \limits_{h\to 0} T(\tilde{\phi}_{x+h}-\tilde{\phi}_{x}) \\ =&\ \lim \limits_{h\to 0} T(\psi_{x,h}) \\ =&\ T(0) \\ =&\ 0 \end{align*}

Thus, TϕT\ast \phi is continuous. Also, the following formula holds.

limh0[(Tϕ)(x+h)(Tϕ)(x)h(Tϕ)(x)]= limh0[T(ϕ~x+h)T(ϕ~x)hT(ϕ~x)]= limh0T(ϕ~x+hϕ~xhϕ~x)= limh0T(Ψx,h)= T(0)= 0 \begin{align*} \lim \limits_{h\to 0} \left[ \frac{ \left( T \ast \phi \right)(x+h)- (T\ast \phi)(x) }{h}- (T\ast \phi^{\prime})(x)\right] =&\ \lim \limits_{h\to 0} \left[ \frac{ T(\tilde{\phi}_{x+h}) -T(\tilde{\phi}_{x}) }{h}- T(\tilde{\phi^{\prime}}_{x})\right] \\ =&\ \lim \limits_{h\to 0} T\left( \frac{ \tilde{\phi}_{x+h} - \tilde{\phi}_{x} }{h}- \tilde{\phi^{\prime}}_{x}\right) \\ =&\ \lim \limits_{h \to 0}T \left( \Psi_{x,h} \right) \\ =&\ T(0) \\ =&\ 0 \end{align*}

Therefore, TϕT\ast \phi is differentiable, and its derivative is TϕT\ast \phi^{\prime}. In the same manner, the nnth derivative of TϕT\ast \phi is as follows.

(Tϕ)(n)=Tϕ(n)nN \left( T \ast \phi \right)^{(n)}=T\ast \phi^{(n)}\quad \forall n\in \mathbb{N}


  1. Gerald B. Folland, Fourier Analysis and Its Applications (1992), p316-317 ↩︎