Principal Ideal Domain
Definition 1
Assume that of the domain is not a unit.
PID
If all ideals of are principal ideals, then is called a Principal Ideal Domain.
Subsidiary Definitions
- Let the commutative ring have a unity . If there exists an that satisfies for a given , then is said to divide or is a factor of , denoted as .
- If and , then are called associates.
- If for and , one of or is a unit, then is called an irreducible element.
- If and , then or is called a prime element.
- Unity is the identity element for multiplication, and unit refers to elements that have an inverse element for multiplication.
Theorem 2
Assume is a Principal Ideal Domain.
- [1]: is a Noetherian ring.
- [2]: A non-unit in is expressed as a product of irreducible elements.
- [3]: If is a maximal ideal in , is an irreducible element of .
- [4]: The irreducible elements of are prime elements.
Explanation
The term ‘Principal Ideal Domain’ is often abbreviated as PID due to its length.
Note that the term associative can refer to both the noun meaning of associates as well as the associative property, which has the same spelling but different meaning. Associative elements can be represented with units .
Examples
Integer Ring
The integer ring has all ideals expressed as principal ideals like .
Any Field
Gaussian Integer Ring and Eisenstein Integer Ring
The Gaussian integer ring and the Eisenstein integer ring are rings obtained by adding pure imaginary or to the integer ring respectively.
Proof
[1]
Definition of Noetherian Ring: Let be a ring.
- When the ideals of satisfy , it is called an ascending chain.
- If there exists that satisfies for an ascending chain , it is called stationary. In a stationary ascending chain, the ideal does not grow indefinitely from a certain point.
- A ring where every ascending chain is stationary is called a Noetherian ring.
Consider an ascending chain of ideals in and their union . For some , we have Since is clearly defined as an ideal, it is a subring, and the additive inverse for must exist. Furthermore, implies , and by the subring validation theorem, becomes a subring of . More than that, since is an ideal, for all , we have , and since , becomes an ideal of .
Since is a PID, all ideals are principal ideals, representable as for some . As , if , there must exist a natural number that satisfies . This means there exists a principal ideal with generator among the ideals smaller than . In symbolic terms, Therefore, . Hence, is a Noetherian ring.
■
[2]
If is an irreducible element, there is nothing to prove. For a non-unit , assume it is expressed as .
Then , and by continually defining , we obtain an ascending chain However, according to theorem [1], there must exist a terminal in this sequence, which becomes an irreducible factor of . Denote the irreducible dividing by , and for a non-unit , assume . Then, by continually defining , we obtain another ascending chain According to theorem [1] again, there must exist a terminal in this chain which becomes an irreducible factor of .
By repeating this procedure finitely, can be expressed as a product of irreducible elements.
■
[3]
Assume of the maximal ideal of can be expressed as for a non-unit .
Then , but if , since must be a unit, actually is obtained. Since is a maximal ideal, , and hence and are associates. Summarizing:
- If , is a unit.
- If , is a unit.
Hence, must be an irreducible element.
Assuming for an irreducible element .
If is a unit, then , which poses no issue, but if is not a unit, then must be a unit.
The fact that is a unit implies for some , Therefore, , thus . Summarizing:
- Either or
- must hold,
Therefore, becomes a maximal ideal.
■
[4]
If is an irreducible element, then by theorem [3] is a maximal ideal and thus implies a prime ideal.
If divides , then , and since is a prime ideal, or . Rewriting this in another form, if , then or , meaning is a prime element.
■