Reflection and Refraction
Definitions 1
- In a ring , a that is not and satisfies is called a Zero Divisor.
- A with a unit and without zero divisors is called an Integral Domain.
Description
Zero Divisors
Examples of non- elements whose product is include and . Hence, it is essential to be cautious as not everything in a ring behaves conveniently. This implies that if and , we cannot assert that .
Integral Domains
ID is a common abbreviation for Integral Domains.
An example of an integral domain is simple to illustrate with the set of integers . Naturally, the term “Integral” originates from the word “Integer”. A significant advantage of an integral domain is that there is no need to worry about division by anything other than . In an integral domain, if , it assures that either or , making it highly useful as an algebraic structure.
That is an integral domain guarantees that the Cancellation law applies to multiplication in , indicating that it is a ring without zero divisors, closely related to a field. Let’s explore the following useful theorems.
Theorems
- [1]: A field is an integral domain.
- [2]: A finite integral domain is a field.
- [3] If is prime, then is a field.
- [4]: A field has only two idempotents, and .
Proofs
[1]
For a field , if and , then and concurrently, holds. This means that if , one of them must be , so elements of a field cannot be zero divisors, and is an integral domain.
■
[2]
Let’s name the elements of a finite integral domain , excluding , as . Considering them multiplied by , since is an integral domain, none of these are .
Since the cancellation law holds in an integral domain, if , then . This implies , leading to . Therefore, there always exists a satisfying for . Since is the multiplicative inverse of , is a field.
■
[3]
Obviously, is a finite set. Given is prime, there exist no non- satisfying , so is an integral domain and, by theorem [2], a field.
■
[4]
For a field , if and , then and are idempotents of . Assuming the existence of an idempotent that is neither nor leads to , hence . However, given theorem [1], since is an integral domain and does not have zero divisors, this assumption is contradictory.
■
See Also
- Euclidean Domain Principal Ideal Domain Unique Factorization Domain Integral Domain
Fraleigh. (2003). A first course in abstract algebra(7th Edition): p178~179. ↩︎