Shilov's theorem
Theorem 1
Let’s say we have a finite group that satisfies prime numbers and for some natural number where is . A Sylow -subgroup of is a -subgroup that is not contained in any other -subgroup.
- First Sylow Theorem: has a -subgroup satisfying for .
- Second Sylow Theorem: For Sylow -subgroups , of , there exists satisfying .
- Third Sylow Theorem: The number of Sylow -subgroups of is a remainder of dividing into and is a divisor of .
Explanation
The Sylow -subgroup effectively refers to a -subgroup that exactly satisfies . In abstract mathematics, which makes active use of sets, expressions like “not contained in another” often describe Maximal.
Thus, a Sylow -subgroup is, in essence, the ’largest’ -subgroup of (although being the largest doesn’t guarantee it’s the only one). Since our focus is on Sylow -groups, whether or not other -groups exist up to doesn’t matter much.
Therefore, the First Sylow Theorem essentially states that ‘ must have a Sylow -subgroup’. This expression was used because of its generality to Cauchy’s theorem, both in terms of expression and proof method.
Furthermore, the existence of satisfying can also be described as , being Conjugate to each other. This can clean up the above theorems as follows:
- First Sylow Theorem: has a Sylow -subgroup.
- Second Sylow Theorem: Sylow -subgroups , of are conjugate to each other.
- Third Sylow Theorem: If the number of Sylow -subgroups of is , then
Fraleigh. (2003). A first course in abstract algebra(7th Edition): p323~326. ↩︎