Proof of Levi's Theorem in Measure Theory
Theorem 1
If $\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \int |f_{k}| dm < \infty$, then $\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} f_{k} (x)$ converges almost everywhere, is Lebesgue integrable, and its integral is concretely given as follows. $$ \int \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} f_{k} dm = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \int f_{k} dm $$
Proof
Part 1. $\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} f_{k} (x)$ converges almost everywhere and is Lebesgue integrable
If we define $\displaystyle \phi (x) := \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} | f_{k} (x) |$, then $\phi$ is a non-negative measurable function.
Corollary of the Monotone Convergence Theorem: Let a sequence $\left\{ f_{n} \right\}$ of measurable functions whose values are non-negative satisfy $f_{n} \nearrow f$. Then $$\int \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_{n} dm = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \int f_{n} dm$$
By the Monotone Convergence Theorem, $$ \displaystyle \int \phi dm = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \int | f_{k} | dm $$ and since by assumption $\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \int |f_{k}| dm < \infty$, the value $\int \phi dm$ is finite, so $\phi$ is Lebesgue integrable, that is, $\phi \in \mathcal{L}^{1}$. Therefore $\phi$ is finite almost everywhere, and from the definition itself, $$ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \left| f_{k} \right| = \phi < \infty $$ so $\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} | f_{k } (x) |$ converges almost everywhere, and hence $\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} f_{k } (x)$ also converges almost everywhere. Meanwhile, since $$ \begin{align*} \left| \sum_{ k=1 }^{ n } f_{k} (x) \right| \le & \sum_{ k=1 }^{ n } \left| f_{k} (x) \right| \\ \le & \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \left| f_{k} (x) \right| \\ = & \phi (x) \end{align*} $$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$ the inequality $\displaystyle \left| \sum_{ k=1 }^{ n } f_{k} (x) \right| \le \phi (x)$ holds almost everywhere. Finally, we define $f$, which is similar to $\phi$ but without the absolute value inside the sigma, as $$ f(x) := \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} f_{k} (x) $$ and for such an $f$, at points where it does not converge we simply set it to $f(x)$, which can guarantee that it is a Lebesgue integrable function. Accordingly, $$ \left| \sum_{ k=1 }^{ n } f_{k} \right| \le \phi \qquad , \phi \in \mathcal{L}^{1} \\ f = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_{k} $$ so we are now ready to use the Dominated Convergence Theorem.
Part 2. The concrete integral
Dominated Convergence Theorem: For a measurable set $E \in \mathcal{M}$ and $g \in \mathcal{L}^{1} (E)$, let a sequence $\left\{ f_{n} \right\}$ of measurable functions satisfy $|f_{n}| \le g$ almost everywhere on $E$. If $\displaystyle f = \lim_{n \to \infty} f_{n}$ almost everywhere on $E$, then $$f \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(E) \\ \lim_{ n \to \infty} \int_{E} f_{n} (x) dm = \int_{E} f dm$$
Therefore the following holds. $$ \begin{align*} \int \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} f_{k} dm = & \int \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_{k} dm \\ =& \int f dm \\ =& \lim_{n \to \infty} \int \sum_{k=1}^{n} f_{k} dm \\ =& \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{k=1}^{n} \int f_{k} dm \\ =& \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \int f_{k} dm \end{align*} $$
■
Explanation
This theorem, proved by the Italian mathematician beppo Levi, makes the integration of a sequence of functions astonishingly easy.
Example
Evaluate $\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1} \left( {{ \log x } \over {1-x}} \right)^2 dx$.
Solution
If we define $f_{n} (x) : = n x^{n-1} ( \log x )^2$, then since $\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n x^{n-1} = {{1} \over {(1-x)^2}}$, $$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_{n} (x) = \left( {{ \log x } \over {1-x}} \right)^2 $$ holds. By Levi’s Theorem, $$\int_{0}^{1} f (x) dx = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \int_{0}^{1} f_{n} (x) dx$$ and by integration by parts, $$\int_{0}^{1} f_{n} (x) dx = \int_{0}^{1} n x^{n-1} ( \log x )^2 dx = {{2} \over {n^2}}$$ Therefore we obtain the following. $$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1} f(x) dx = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} {{2} \over {n^2}} = {{\pi^2} \over {3}}$$
Commentary
The key to solving the problem is ultimately to find an $f_{n}$ satisfying $ \begin{cases} \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f_{n} (x) = f(x) \\ \displaystyle \int_{E} f(x) dx = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \int_{E} f_{n} (x) dx \end{cases}$. It is true that this process is by no means easy, but it will surely be far easier than solving it by finding an antiderivative as in Riemann integration.
See Also
Capinski. (1999). Measure, Integral and Probability: p95. ↩︎
