logo

Inversion in Complex Analysis 📂Complex Anaylsis

Inversion in Complex Analysis

Definition 1

Consider a line L:2px+2qy+c=0L: 2px + 2qy + c = 0 and a circle C:zA=r\mathscr{C}: |z - A | = r, and a point P:z=x+iyP: z = x + iy that is not on them. The inverse point is defined as follows.

  1. A Q:z=x+iyQ: z^{ \ast } = x^{ \ast } + i y^{ \ast } that satisfies yyxx=qp\displaystyle {{y - y^{ \ast }} \over {x - x^{ \ast }}} = {{q} \over {p}} and p(x+x)+q(y+iy)+c=0p(x + x^{ \ast }) + q(y + i y^{ \ast }) + c = 0 is defined as the inverse point of PP with respect to line LL. 20180209\_121849.png2. A Q:z=x+iyQ: z^{ \ast } = x^{ \ast } + i y^{ \ast } that satisfies APAQ=r2\overline{AP} \cdot \overline{AQ} = r^2 is defined as the inverse point of PP with respect to circle C\mathscr{C}. 20180209\_121857.png

Explanation

Defining the inverse point as a reflection point with respect to a line is quite intuitive, but the inverse point with respect to a circle may feel unfamiliar. Especially, the inverse point of the center of a circle being infinity, i.e., PAP \to A when QQ \to \infty, can be quite challenging to accept. However, it seems complicated only because of the definitions and illustrations; fundamentally, it is equivalent to taking r2z\displaystyle {{r^2} \over {z}} with the center of the circle and its axis.

If you are still not getting it, let’s say C:z=2\mathscr{C}: |z| = 2 and directly calculate QQ by setting P=1P = 1. By using trigonometry, it can be easily confirmed that Q=4=221\displaystyle Q = 4 = { {2^2} \over {1} }. It’s obvious that every point inside a circle corresponds one-to-one with every point outside the circle—such an easy concept wouldn’t have been overlooked. But trying to eliminate ambiguous expressions in writing led to many omissions, making it seem unfamiliar.

The following principles can be easily derived from the fact that circles and lines remain circles and lines even when subjected to bilinear transformations.

Symmetry Principle

Let’s say zz and zz^{ \ast } are inverse points to each other.

  • [1] Line: Bz+Bz+c=0Bz + \overline{Bz} + c = 0     \iff Bz+Bz+c=0Bz^{ \ast } + \overline{Bz} + c = 0
  • [2] Circle: azz+Bz+Bz+c=0a z \overline{z} + Bz + \overline{Bz} + c = 0     \iff azz+Bz+Bz+c=0a z^{ \ast } \overline{z} + Bz^{ \ast } + \overline{Bz} + c = 0
  • [3] All bilinear transformations map the inverse point of C~\tilde { \mathbb{C} } to the inverse point of C~\tilde { \mathbb{C} }.

  1. Osborne (1999). Complex variables and their applications: p205. ↩︎