logo

Topological Spaces: Separability and Closure 📂Topology

Topological Spaces: Separability and Closure

Definition 1

For a topological space XX, let’s say AXA \subset X.

  1. When an open set OO exists that satisfies xOAx \in O \subset A, xx is called the interior point of AA.
  2. The set of interior points of AA, AA^{\circ}, is called the interior of AA.
  3. The union of AA and its codomain A:=Aa\overline{A} : = A \cup a ' is called the closure of AA.
  4. When xAx \in \overline{A} and also xXAx \in \overline{X \setminus A}, xx is called the boundary point of AA.
  5. A:=AXA\partial A : = \overline{A} \cap \overline{X \setminus A} is called the boundary of AA.
  6. When A=X\overline{A} = X, AA is said to be dense in XX.
  7. When (A)=\left( \overline{A} \right) ^{\circ} = \emptyset, AA is said to be nowhere dense in XX.
  8. If XX has a dense countable subset, then XX is said to be separable.

Explanation

Let’s confirm that various definitions previously defined in metric spaces can also be brought over without any problems.

A typical example of a separable space is Q=R\overline{ \mathbb{Q} } = \mathbb{R}.

If the notion of a countable subset is difficult, one might first think of segmenting the real space R\mathbb{R} with the set of integers Z\mathbb{Z}. Although this imagery is easy to imagine, dividing any set into its subsets is easy and thus meaningless. Conversely, dividing it into uncountable subsets would be too chaotic to manage and ultimately meaningless. On the other hand, if there is a concept that satisfies both density and countability, as defined, it could be considered neither too simple nor too difficult. In such a case, the subset AA, though referred to as a subset, must feel like a large ‘skeleton’ that supports the entire set.

Taking the metaphor of a skeleton a step further, saying that a space is a separable space essentially guarantees the existence of sequences {xn}nN\left\{ x_{n} \right\}_{n \in \mathbb{N} } converging to xx, for any given xXx \in X. For example, if xRx \in \mathbb{R} is given, it means that we can find a sequence of rationals {qn}nN\left\{ q_{n} \right\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}} that converge to xx no matter what xx is.

The importance of separability lies in it enabling us to create sequences (countable) that converge (dense) to the elements we desire. From a practical standpoint, the usefulness of this property becomes even more apparent. In applied mathematics, approximating some complex functions with well-known, simpler functions is undoubtedly crucial.

For instance, the space of continuous functions C[a,b]C[a,b] is a separable space, which means we can find a sequence of continuous functions {fn}nN\left\{ f_{n} \right\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}} that converge to any given ff. Uncovering what exactly these {fn}nN\left\{ f_{n} \right\}_{n \in \mathbb{N}} are is the responsibility of applied mathematics, such as numerical analysis, but proving their existence is the purview of pure mathematics.

Theorem

Methods to Determine Density

As a way to determine density, remember the following useful equivalence condition:

For AA to be dense in XX is equivalent to every open subset UU of XX having an intersection with UAU \cap A \ne \emptyset.

Basic Properties: Boundary of a Subspace

  • [1]: AA    A=A\partial A \subset A \iff A = \overline{A}
  • [2]: AXA    A=A\partial A \subset X \setminus A \iff A = A^{\circ}
  • [3]: A=    A=A=A\partial A = \emptyset \iff A = A^{\circ}= \overline{A}

It’s unrelated to countability, but now that these concepts are newly defined, make sure to be aware of these properties.

Using the boundary to determine whether space is open or closed can be a useful property. As one becomes more accustomed to topology, realizing that spaces can become increasingly abstract, it’s important to be thankful that one can infer definitions and contemplate just from the words.


  1. Munkres. (2000). Topology(2nd Edition): p95, 97. ↩︎