Summation Formulas for All Integers Using Residue Theorem📂Complex Anaylsis
Summation Formulas for All Integers Using Residue Theorem
Formulas
The ratio of a polynomial function, that is, a rational functionf, assumes f(n)=0 at n∈Z while being limz→∞zf(z)=0. When f has a finite singularityz1,⋯,zm,
n=−∞∑∞f(n)=−n=1∑mReszn(πf(z)cotπz)
Explanation
It’s meaningful not just to sum up all natural numbers but to represent the sum of all integers within a finite sum. Certainly, if the given f is an even function, taking half of it could also be applied to finding the sum over natural numbers. Cotangent is involved here and there up to π in a complex form due to multiple multiplications, which might be hard to memorize but it’s good to know such a tool exists.
Considering a path Ck like in the picture above for a natural number k∈N. Let’s assume there exists a natural numberk0 such that when k>k0, rational functionf is continuous on Ck and z→∞limzf(z)=0.
For each Ck, given that it’s continuous and ∣z∣≥k+21>k for all ε>0,
∣z∣1<δ⟹∣zf(z)∣<ε
there exists a δ>0 that satisfies. Selecting k>δ1, there exists a k that satisfies ∣f(z)∣<k+1/2ε about ε>0 on Ck.
Addition formulas for trigonometric functions:
sin(α+β)=sinαcosβ+cosαsinβsin(α−β)=sinαcosβ−cosαsinβcos(α+β)=cosαcosβ−sinαsinβcos(α−β)=cosαcosβ+sinαsinβtan(α+β)=1−tanαtanβtanα+tanβtan(α−β)=1+tanαtanβtanα−tanβ
If we conveniently set α:=k+1/2, then cosαπ=0 and sinαπ=(−1)k. On Ck, ∣cotπz∣ is z=±α+iy on the vertical line of Ck and ∣y∣≤α, therefore
∣cotπz∣=====<sinπzcosπzsin±απcosiπy+icosαπsiniπycosαπcosiπy−sin±απsiniπy±sinαπcoshπy+icosαπsinhπycosαπcoshπy∓isinαπsinhπy1⋅coshπy+00+1⋅sinhπy∣tanhπy∣1
and on the horizontal line of Ck, it’s z=x±iα and similarly ∣x∣≤α. Since the magnitude of the imaginary root of a real number is always 1,
eiπxe∓απ+e−iπxe±απ≤eiπxe∓απ−e−iπxe±απ≥eiπxe∓απ+e−iπxe±απ=eαπ+e−απeiπxe∓απ−e−iπxe±απ=eαπ−e−απ
from which we obtain the following:
∣cotπz∣=sinπzcosπz==≤=≤≤<eiπz−e−iπzeiπz+e−iπzeiπxe∓απ−e−iπxe±απeiπxe∓απ+e−iπxe±απeαπ−e−απeαπ+e−απcotαπmax{±cot21π,±cot23π}cot23π2∵sinαπ=(−1)k
Eventually, ∣cotπz∣ is always bounded on the rectangle Ck.
Part 2. limk→∞∫Ckf(z)cotπzdz=0
The length of Ck is
8(k+21)
thus, by the ML lemma,
k1<δ⟹∫Ckf(z)cotπzdz≤k+1/28(k+1/2)2ε=16ε
Therefore,
k→∞lim∫Ckf(z)cotπzdz=0
Part 3. ∑n=−∞∞f(n)=−∑n=1mReszn(πf(z)cotπz)
Now, defining F(z):=πf(z)cotπz as f(n)=0, n∈Zs are all simple poles F. Calculating the residues,
ResnF(z)=(sinπz)′πf(z)cosπz=πcosπzπf(z)cosπzz=n=f(n)
According to the assumption, F still possess singularities z1,z2,⋯,zm, hence by the residue theorem,
k→∞lim∫CkF(z)dz==k→∞lim2πi(n=−k∑kf(n)+n=1∑mResznF(z))2πi(n=−∞∑∞f(n)+n=1∑mReszn(πf(z)cotπz))
We’ve already shown above that k→∞lim∫Ckf(z)cotπzdz=0, therefore
n=−∞∑∞f(n)=−n=1∑mReszn(πf(z)cotπz)
■
Formula for Alternating Series
Formula for the sum of an alternating series over all integers: For the rational functionf,
z→∞limzf(z)=0
assuming f(n)=0 at n∈Z while being limz→∞zf(z)=0. When f has a finite singularityz1,⋯,zm,
n=−∞∑∞(−1)nf(n)=−n=1∑mReszn(πf(z)cscπz)
Try deriving it similarly for alternating series by writing it down manually.
Osborne (1999). Complex variables and their applications: p182~184. ↩︎