logo

Flow in Simple Extremes 📂Complex Anaylsis

Flow in Simple Extremes

Theorem 1

It can be said that function ff can be expressed as f(z)=g(z)h(z)\displaystyle f(z) = {{g(z)} \over {h(z)}}. Here, gg and hh are analytic in α\alpha, and if we say g(α)0,h(α)=0,h(α)0g(\alpha) \ne 0 , h(\alpha) = 0, h ' (\alpha) \ne 0 then α\alpha is a simple pole of ff Resαf(z)=g(α)h(α) \text{Res}_{\alpha} f(z) = {{g(\alpha)} \over {h ' (\alpha)}}

It’s not just that hh in the form of f(z)=g(z)h(z)\displaystyle f(z) = {{g(z)} \over {h(z)}} has to be a polynomial, so it can’t be said to be simply a theorem limiting the residue to m=1m=1. As long as the conditions are met well, it’s possible to cover much more types of functions, hh, which makes its application infinite.

One thing to note is that if you read through the theorem properly, it is not a condition but a result that ff has a simple pole α\alpha.

α\alpha being a simple pole is not something to show but something shown, so all that is needed is to pay attention to the conditions regarding gg and hh.

Proof

From the assumption since h(α)0h ' (\alpha) \ne 0, if we set H(z)=h(z)h(α)zα\displaystyle H(z) = {{ h(z) - h(\alpha) } \over { z - \alpha }} then under assumption H(α)=h(α)0H(\alpha) = h ' (\alpha) \ne 0 since h(α)=0h(\alpha) = 0, f(z)=g(z)h(z)=g(z)h(z)h(α)=g(z)(zα)H(z) f(z) = {{g(z)} \over {h(z)}} = {{g(z)} \over {h(z) - h(\alpha) }} = {{g(z)} \over {(z - \alpha) H(z) }} g/Hg / H is analytic in α\alpha and since g(α)H(α)0\displaystyle {{g(\alpha)} \over {H(\alpha)}} \ne 0, α\alpha is a 11th order pole of ff.

Residue at a pole: If α\alpha is a simple pole then Resαf(z)=limzα(zα)f(z)\displaystyle \text{Res}_{\alpha} f(z) = \lim_{z \to \alpha} (z - \alpha) f(z)

The residue at a pole is Resαf(z)=limzαg(z)1H(z)=limzαg(z)limzαzαh(z)h(α)=g(α)1h(α) \begin{align*} \text{Res}_{\alpha} f(z) =& \lim_{z \to \alpha} g(z) {{1} \over {H(z)}} \\ =& \lim_{z \to \alpha} g(z) \cdot \lim_{z \to \alpha} {{z - \alpha} \over {h(z) - h(\alpha) }} \\ =& g(\alpha) \cdot {{1} \over {h ' (\alpha) }} \end{align*}

Order-2 Pole

While less practical as a formula, the following theorem is known for 22. The method of proof is fundamentally no different from that used for simple poles.

Residue at an Order-22 pole: Assuming that the function ff can be expressed as f(z)=g(z)h(z)\displaystyle f(z) = {{g(z)} \over {h(z)}}. Here, gg and hh are analytic in α\alpha, and if g(α)0,h(α)=h(α)=0,h’’(α)0g(\alpha) \ne 0 , h(\alpha) = h ' (\alpha) = 0, h’’(\alpha) \ne 0 is said, then α\alpha is an order-22 pole of ff, Resαf(z)=2g(α)h’’(α)2g(α)h’’’(α)3(h’’(α))2\displaystyle \text{Res}_{\alpha} f(z) = {{2g ' (\alpha)} \over {h’’(\alpha)}} - {{2g(\alpha) h’’’(\alpha) } \over {3 (h’’(\alpha))^2 }}


  1. Osborne (1999). Complex variables and their applications: p158. ↩︎