logo

Orthogonal Complement of a Subspace 📂Linear Algebra

Orthogonal Complement of a Subspace

Definition1

In the set

W={vV :v,w=0,wW} W^{\perp} = \left\{ \mathbf{v} \in V \ : \left\langle \mathbf{v} , \mathbf{w} \right\rangle = 0,\quad \forall \mathbf{w} \in W \right\}

for the subspace WW of a vector space VV, it is called the orthogonal complement of WW. Here ,\langle , \rangle is the inner product.

Explanation

In other words, WW^{\perp} is a collection of vectors that are orthogonal to every element of WW. The symbol ^{\perp} is abbreviated as perp[펍] for perpendicular. Because it’s a literal definition, it’s easily understood, especially in Euclidean spaces. For a simple example, if W=span{(1,0,0),(0,1,0)}W = \text{span} \left\{ (1,0,0) , (0,1,0) \right\} is given by R3\mathbb{R}^{3} then it becomes W=span{(0,0,1)}W^{\perp} = \text{span} \left\{ (0,0,1) \right\}.

Properties

Let WW and RR be subspaces of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, denoted by AMm×n(R)A \in M_{ m \times n}(\mathbb{R}). Then, the following properties are satisfied:

[1] (W)=W( W^{\perp} ) ^{\perp} = W

[2] WW=Rn W \oplus W^{\perp} = \mathbb{R}^{n}

[3] RW    WRR \subset W \iff W^{\perp} \subset R^{\perp}

[4] N(A)=R(A)\mathcal{N} (A)^{\perp} = \mathcal{R} (A)

[5] C(A)=N(AT)\mathcal{C} (A)^{\perp} = \mathcal{N} (A^{T})

[6] Rm=C(A)N(AT)\mathbb{R}^m = \mathcal{C} (A) \oplus \mathcal{N} (A^{T})

[7] Rn=R(A)N(A)\mathbb{R}^n = \mathcal{R} (A) \oplus \mathcal{N}(A)

These properties can also be considered obvious when thinking about the definition of orthogonal complement. However, [2] can be a bit tricky and needs to be checked carefully. These properties, along with the properties of considering null space and column space together, are important.

While these properties may seem complex at first glance, fortunately, seeing \perp as the reversed version of TT makes them not too hard to memorize. It’s like flipping N\mathcal{N} and CC inside and out without confusion.

On another note, the Rank-Nullity Theorem could also be considered as applying dim\dim to [6], [7].

Theorem

If WW is a subspace of the inner space VV, then the following holds:

(a) WW^{\perp} is a subspace of VV.

(b) WW={0}W \cap W^{\perp} = \left\{ \mathbf{0} \right\}

Proof

(a)

Since w,0=0\langle \mathbf{w}, \mathbf{0} \rangle = 0 for all wW\mathbf{w} \in W, at least 0\mathbf{0} is included in WW^{\perp}. Since it is not an empty set, we just need to check if it is closed under addition and scalar multiplication. Let’s say u,vW\mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v} \in W^{\perp} kRk\in R. Then, the following equation is satisfied:

u+v,w=u,w+v,w=0+0=0ku,w=ku,v=k0=0 \begin{align*} \langle \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v}, \mathbf{w} \rangle =& \langle \mathbf{u}, \mathbf{w} \rangle + \langle \mathbf{v}, \mathbf{w} \rangle = 0 + 0 = 0 \\ \langle k \mathbf{u}, \mathbf{w} \rangle =& k \langle \mathbf{u}, \mathbf{v} \rangle = k \cdot 0 = 0 \end{align*} Thus, WW^{\perp} is a subspace.

(b)

Let’s say vWW\mathbf{v} \in W \cap W^{\perp}. Then, v\mathbf{v} being orthogonal to v\mathbf{v} means

v,v=0 \langle \mathbf{v}, \mathbf{v} \rangle = 0

And the v\mathbf{v} satisfying this is only 0\mathbf{0} by the definition of the inner product.


  1. Howard Anton, Elementary Linear Algebra: Aplications Version(12th Edition). 2019, p356~357 ↩︎