Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Uniform Convergence
📂AnalysisNecessary and Sufficient Condition for Uniform Convergence
Theorem 1
Let us suppose that a sequence of functions {fn} defined on the metric space E is given. The following two conditions are equivalent.
- {fn} converges uniformly on E.
- For all ε>0, there exists a natural number N such that the following equation holds.
m,n≥N, x∈E⟹∣fn(x)−fm(x)∣≤ε
Explanation
In other words, for all x∈E, {fn(x)} being a Cauchy sequence is equivalent to {fn} converging uniformly on E.
Proof
(⟹)
Assume that {fn} converges uniformly to f. Then, by definition, there exists a natural number N such that the following equation holds.
n≤N,x∈E⟹∣fn(x)−f(x)∣≤2ε
Therefore, for n,m≥N, x∈E, the following equation holds.
∣fn(x)−fm(x)∣=∣fn(x)−f(x)+f(x)−fm(x)∣≤∣fn(x)−f(x)∣+∣f(x)−fm(x)∣≤2ε+2ε=ε
(⟸)
By assumption, {fn(x)} is a Cauchy sequence and thus convergent. Let this limit be f(x). Then {fn} converges pointwise to f on E.
Now, to show that this convergence is uniform will complete the proof. Suppose ε>0 is given. Choose N such that (1) holds. Taking the limit m→∞ for the fixed n in (1), we get the following.
m→∞limfm(x)=f(x)
Therefore, for all n≥N and x∈E, the following holds.
m→∞lim∣fn(x)−fm(x)∣=∣fn(x)−f(x)∣≤ε
Hence, {fn} converges uniformly to f.
■
Theorem 2
Let us assume that the following holds for the metric spaces E and x∈E.
n→∞limfn(x)=f(x)
Let’s set Mn as follows.
Mn=x∈Esup∣fn(x)−f(x)∣
Then, the following two conditions are equivalent:
Explanation
Considering the definition of uniform convergence, it is just another way of describing the same concept.