logo

Mean Value Theorem in Analysis 📂Analysis

Mean Value Theorem in Analysis

Theorem

Let the functions ff and gg be continuous on the interval [a,b][a,b] and differentiable on (a,b)(a,b). Then there exists x(a,b)x \in (a,b) that satisfies the following equation.

[f(b)f(a)]g(x)=[g(b)g(a)]f(x) [f(b)-f(a)]g^{\prime}(x)=[g(b)-g(a)]f^{\prime}(x)


Note that differentiability is not necessary at the endpoints aa and bb.

Explanation

This is a generalization of the Mean Value Theorem learned in high school and in calculus. If we set it as g(x)=xg(x)=x, it becomes the familiar form.

Corollary: Mean Value Theorem

Let the function ff be continuous on [a,b][a,b] and differentiable on (a,b)(a,b) as a real function. Then there exists x(a,b)x\in (a,b) that satisfies the following equation.

f(b)f(a)=(ba)f(x) f(b)-f(a)=(b-a)f^{\prime}(x)

Proof

Let us define function hh as follows.

h(t)=[f(b)f(a)]g(t)[g(b)g(a)]f(t)(atb) h(t) = [f(b)-f(a)]g(t) -[g(b)-g(a)]f(t)\quad (a\le t \le b)

Then hh is continuous on [a,b][a,b] as the sum of continuous functions. Also, it is differentiable on (a,b)(a,b) as the sum of differentiable functions. Then the following holds.

h(t)=[f(b)f(a)]g(t)[g(b)g(a)]f(t) h^{\prime}(t)= [f(b)-f(a)]g^{\prime}(t) -[g(b)-g(a)]f^{\prime}(t)

Also, the following equation holds.

h(a)=[f(b)f(a)]g(a)[g(b)g(a)]f(a)=f(b)g(a)f(a)g(b)=[f(b)f(a)]g(b)[g(b)g(a)]f(b)=h(b) \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} h(a) &= [f(b)-f(a)]g(a)-[g(b)-g(a)]f(a) \\ &= f(b)g(a)-f(a)g(b) \\ &= [f(b)-f(a)]g(b)-[g(b)-g(a)]f(b) \\ &= h(b) \end{aligned} \label{eq1} \end{equation}

Now, proving that for some x(a,b)x\in (a,b), h(x)=0h^{\prime}(x)=0 holds concludes the proof.

  • Case 1. If hh is constant

    For all x(a,b)x \in (a,b), h(x)=0h^{\prime}(x)=0 holds.

  • Case 2. If for some t(a,b)t\in (a,b), h(t)>h(a)h(t) > h(a) holds

    By the Extreme Value Theorem, there exists a x[a,b]x\in [a,b] where the function value of hh is maximum. Then by (eq1)\eqref{eq1}, x(a,b)x \in (a,b) holds. Then, xx is a local maximum of hh and differentiable at xx, so h(x)=0h^{\prime}(x)=0 holds.

  • Case 3. If for some t(a,b)t \in (a,b), h(t)<h(a)h(t)<h(a) holds

    This case is similar to Case 2. where there exists a local minimum x(a,b)x\in (a,b) of hh, and h(x)=0h^{\prime}(x)=0 holds.