logo

Convergence in Distribution Implies Boundedness in Probability 📂Mathematical Statistics

Convergence in Distribution Implies Boundedness in Probability

Theorem

If a sequence $\left\{ X_{n} \right\}$ of random variables converges in distribution, then it is bounded in probability.


Explanation

Since it was previously shown that convergence in probability implies convergence in distribution, considering the contrapositive of this statement, we can also obtain the common-sense corollary that ‘if a sequence is not bounded in probability, it does not converge in probability’.

Proof

Suppose $\epsilon>0$ is given, $X_{n}$ converges in distribution to a random variable $X$, and its cumulative distribution function is $F_{X}$. Then we can find $\eta_{1}, \eta_{2}$ satisfying $\displaystyle F_{X}(x) < {\epsilon \over 2}$ for $\displaystyle x \le \eta_{1}$ and $\displaystyle F_{X}(x) > 1- {\epsilon \over 2}$ for $\displaystyle x \ge \eta_{2}$. Now, letting $\eta = \max ( | \eta_{1} | , | \eta_{2} | )$, $$ \begin{align*} P[|X|\le \eta] =& F_X (\eta) - F_X (-\eta) \\ \ge& \left( 1 - {\epsilon \over 2} \right) - {\epsilon \over 2} \\ =& 1- \epsilon \end{align*} $$ Now, considering $X_{n}$, which converges in distribution to $X$, we have $\displaystyle P[|X_{n}|\le \eta] = F_{X_{n}} (\eta) - F_{X_{n}} (-\eta)$. Taking $\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty}$ on both sides (that is, continually choosing sufficiently large $N_{\epsilon}$), from the assumption of convergence in distribution, $\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} F_{X_{n}}(x) = F_X(x)$, so $$ \begin{align*} \lim_{n \to \infty} P[|X_{n}|\le \eta] =& \lim_{n \to \infty} F_{X_{n}} (\eta) - \lim_{n \to \infty} F_{X_{n}} (-\eta) \\ =& F_X (\eta) - F_X (-\eta) \\ \ge& 1 - \epsilon \end{align*} $$ By the definition of boundedness in probability, $\left\{ X_{n} \right\}$ is bounded in probability.