Generalized Cantor's Intersection Theorem in Metric Spaces
📂MetricSpaceGeneralized Cantor's Intersection Theorem in Metric Spaces
Theorem 1
Let’s assume that (X,d) is a metric space. Kn⊂X(n=1,2,⋯) is a non-empty compact subset. In this case, if {Kn}
Kn⊃Kn+1 (n=1,2,⋯)
is satisfied, then ⋂i=1∞Kn=∅ is true.
If we set {Kn} as above, it has the finite intersection property, and therefore it immediately applies as a corollary of the theorem shown below. When set to Kn=In=[an,bn], it becomes the Cantor’s intersection theorem in R.
Definition
Suppose an arbitrary collection {Aα}α∈I is given. If for all finite subsets I of J⊂I the following condition is satisfied, then {Aα} is said to have the finite intersection property.
α∈J⋂Aα=∅∀J⊂I,(J is finite set)
In simpler terms, a collection {Aα} has the finite intersection property if, by selecting any number of sets within the collection and taking their intersection, it never results in an empty set.
Theorem 2
Let’s assume that (X,d) is a metric space. And let’s also assume a collection of compact subsets Kα⊂X have the finite intersection property. Then, the intersection over the entire collection is not an empty set.
α⋂Kα=∅
Proof
We will prove this by contradiction.
Assume that ⋂αKα=∅. Then, choose arbitrarily one member of the collection and call it K1. If we set Fα=(Kα)c as, since in a metric space compact sets are closed sets, the complement of a closed set Fα is an open set. Further, by De Morgan’s laws
K1⊂X=∅c=(α⋂Kα)c=α⋃Fα
Therefore, {Fα} is an open cover of K1. Since K1 is compact, there exists a finite subcover of {Fα} that covers K1.
K1⊂Fα1∪⋯∪Fαn
Since we set Fα=(Kα)c above, the following holds.
K1∩Kα1∩⋯∩Kαn=∅
However, this contradicts the fact that {Kα} has the finite intersection property. Therefore, by contradiction, the following holds.
α⋂Kα=∅
■
See Also