logo

Relatively Open Sets in Metric Spaces 📂MetricSpace

Relatively Open Sets in Metric Spaces

Explanation

Let’s say there are two metric spaces YXY\subset X. And suppose a subset EYXE \subset Y \subset X is given. If EE is open with respect to the entire space XX, then by the definition of being open and interior points, EE remains an open set even when YY is considered the entire space. This is because the situation involves a reduction of the whole set hence there is no way the neighborhood NEN\subset E of pEp\in E grows larger. On the contrary, the fact that EE is open with respect to the whole space YY does not guarantee that EE is also open in XX. That is, being open is not an absolute property but a relative concept determined by what the entire set is. See the example below.

Example

  • E=(a,b)E=(a,b), Y=RY=\mathbb{R}, X=R2X=\mathbb{R}^{2}

    By definition, (a,b)(a,b) is open with respect to the whole space R\mathbb{R}. However, expanding the whole space to R2\mathbb{R}^{2} makes it no longer an open set. This is because there exists no neighborhood NN of any p(a,b)p \in (a,b) that satisfies N(a,b)N\subset (a,b).

  • E=[0,1)E=[0,1), Y=[0,)Y=[0,\infty), X=RX=\mathbb{R}

    Just like Example 1, [0,1)[0,1) is an open set with respect to the whole space [0,)[0,\infty). However, when the whole space is expanded to R\mathbb{R}, [0,1)[0,1) is no longer an open set.

Therefore, when clarifying what it means to be open, the expression “relatively open” is used.

Definition

Given two metric spaces XX, YY, let’s denote it as EYXE\subset Y \subset X. If for every pEp \in E there exists a constant r>0r>0 that satisfies the following condition, then EE is called a relatively open set in YY.

d(p,q)<randqY    qE \begin{equation} d(p,q)<r \quad \text{and} \quad q\in Y \implies q\in E \label{definition} \end{equation}


The expression above doesn’t redefine openness but states ‘if EE is open when the entire space is considered YY’ in formula form. In other words, it can be explained differently as ‘it is possible to form a neighborhood of pEp \in E that is included in EE with only elements in YY’. A theorem regarding this is presented.

Theorem

Suppose we’re given two metric spaces XX, YY. And let EYXE \subset Y \subset X. Then the following two propositions are equivalent.

(a) EE is relatively open in YY.

(b) There exists an open set OXO_{X} in XX such that E=YOXE=Y \cap O_{X} holds.


This can be useful in situations where the total space is reduced. For example, consider a scenario where we were dealing with open sets such as (a,a)(-a,a) in the total space X=RX=\mathbb{R}, but the space gets reduced to Y=[0,)Y=[0,\infty). Then, since (a,a)⊄Y(-a,a)\not \subset Y, we cannot deal with the original open sets in YY. At this point, according to the theorem, we can simply capture the open sets in YY as [0,a)=Y(a,a)[0,a)=Y\cap (-a,a).

Proof

Proof in topological space

  • (a) \Longrightarrow (b)

    By assumption, for every pEp \in E there exists a positive number rp>0r_{p}>0 that satisfies the following.

    d(p,q)<rpandqY    qE d(p,q) <r_{p} \quad \text{and} \quad q\in Y \implies q \in E

    Now, let’s denote the set of qXq\in Xs that are d(p,q)<rpd(p,q)<r_{p} as OX,pO_{X,p}. Then, OX,pO_{X,p} becomes a neighborhood of pp in XX. Since a neighborhood is an open set1, OX,pO_{X,p} is an open set in XX, and since the union of open sets is an open set,

    OX=pEOX,p O_{X}=\bigcup \limits_{p \in E}O_{X,p}

    is an open set in XX. It is trivial that for all pEYp \in E\subset Y, pOX,pp \in O_{X,p} holds. Therefore, the following holds.

    EYOX,p \begin{equation} E\subset Y\cap O_{X,p} \label{eq1} \end{equation}

    On the other hand, by the way we captured OX,pO_{X,p}, the following holds.

    OX,pYE \begin{equation} O_{X,p}\cap Y \subset E \label{eq2} \end{equation}

    Therefore, by (eq1)\eqref{eq1}, (eq2)\eqref{eq2},

    E=YOX,p E=Y\cap O_{X,p}

    and since OX,pO_{X,p} is an open set in XX, (a) \Longrightarrow (b) holds.

  • (a) \Longleftarrow (b)

    OXO_{X} is an open set in XX, and let’s denote it as E=YOXE=Y\cap O_{X}. Then, every pEp\in E has a neighborhood that satisfies NOXN\subset O_{X}. Also, by the inclusion of sets, the following holds.

    YNE Y\cap N \subset E

    This is exactly the same meaning as (definition)\eqref{definition}, hence EE is an open set in YY.


  1. See theorem 1 ↩︎