logo

The Relationship Between the Size of Integrals Based on the Order of Functions 📂Analysis

The Relationship Between the Size of Integrals Based on the Order of Functions

This article is based on Riemann-Stieltjes integration. If we set it as α=α(x)=x\alpha=\alpha (x)=x, it is the same as Riemann integration.

Theorem1

Let us assume that two functions f1,f2f_{1}, f_{2} are Riemann(-Stieltjes) integrable over the interval [a,b][a,b]. Also, assume that f1f2f_{1} \le f_{2} in [a,b][a,b]. Then, the following inequality holds.

abf1dαabf2dα \int_{a}^{b}f_{1}d\alpha \le \int_{a}^{b}f_{2}d\alpha

Proof

Let there be a positive ε>0\varepsilon >0. Since f2f_{2} is integrable, by the necessary and sufficient condition necessary and sufficient condition, there exists a partition P={a=x0,,xn=b}P=\left\{ a=x_{0},\cdots,x_{n}=b \right\} of [a,b][a,b] that satisfies the following equation.

U(P,f2,α)L(P,f2,α)<ε U(P,f_{2},\alpha) - L(P,f_{2},\alpha) < \varepsilon

Since f1f2f_{1}\le f_{2} in the interval [a,b][a,b], by the definition of upper sum, the following equation holds.

U(P,f1,α)U(P,f2,α) \begin{equation} U(P,f_{1},\alpha) \le U(P,f_{2},\alpha) \label{eq1} \end{equation}

Moreover, by the definition of integration, the following inequality holds.

abf1dαU(P,f1,α) \begin{equation} \int_{a}^{b}f_{1}d\alpha \le U(P,f_{1},\alpha) \tag{2} \label{eq2} \end{equation}

Also, the following equation holds.

U(P,f2,α)<abf2dα+ε \begin{equation} U(P,f_{2},\alpha) < \int_{a}^{b}f_{2}d\alpha +\varepsilon \label{eq3} \end{equation}

Now, by synthesizing (eq1),(eq2),(eq3)\eqref{eq1}, \eqref{eq2}, \eqref{eq3}, we obtain the following equation.

abf1dα<abf2dα+ε \int_{a}^{b}f_{1}d\alpha < \int_{a}^{b}f_{2}d\alpha +\varepsilon

Since ε\varepsilon is any positive number, the following holds.

abf1dαabf2dα \int_{a}^{b}f_{1}d\alpha \le \int_{a}^{b}f_{2}d\alpha


  1. Walter Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis (3rd Edition, 1976), p128 ↩︎