logo

Proof of ML Auxiliary Lemma 📂Complex Anaylsis

Proof of ML Auxiliary Lemma

Theorem 1

Let’s say the function ff is piecewise continuous on the integration path C:z=z(t),t[a,b]\mathscr{C}: z = z(t), t \in [a,b]. If the positive number L=abz(t)dt\displaystyle L = \int_{a}^{b} |z’(t)| dt is the length of C\mathscr{C}, and for all points on C\mathscr{C} there exists a positive number MM satisfying f(z)M|f(z)| \le M, then Cf(z)dzML \left| \int_{\mathscr{C}} f(z) dz \right| \le ML

Proof

For the function z:[a,b]Cz’: [a,b] \to \mathbb{C} let’s say abz(t)dt=r\displaystyle \left| \int_{a}^{b} z’(t) dt \right| = r.

If r0r \ne 0 then it can be represented as abz(t)dt=reiθ\displaystyle \int_{a}^{b} z’(t) dt = r e^{i \theta}. Then θ\theta is a constant, therefore r=abeiθz(t)dtabeiθz(t)dt=abeiθz(t)dt r = \int_{a}^{b} e^{- i \theta} z’(t) dt \le \int_{a}^{b} \left| e^{- i \theta} z’(t) \right| dt = \int_{a}^{b} \left| e^{- i \theta} \right| \left| z’(t) \right| dt Here, because the magnitude of a complex number’s real root is always 1, eiθ=1\left| e^{ - i \theta} \right| = 1. Thus, abz(t)dt=rabz(t)dt \left| \int_{a}^{b} z’(t) dt \right| = r \le \int_{a}^{b} \left| z’(t) \right| dt This demonstrates that the properties of definite integrals which hold for real functions are also valid for complex functions. Using the inequality derived above, we get Cf(z)dz=abf(z(t))z(t)dtabf(z(t))z(t)dt=abMz(t)dt=ML \begin{align*} \left| \int_{\mathscr{C}} f(z) dz \right| =& \left| \int_{a}^{b} f(z(t)) z’(t) dt \right| \\ \le & \int_{a}^{b} \left| f(z(t)) \right| \left| z’(t) \right| dt \\ =& \int_{a}^{b} M \left| z’(t) \right| dt \\ =& ML \end{align*}

Explanation

In the ML Lemma, M stands for Maximum, and L stands for Length.

What can be confusing when using the ML Lemma is how to choose LL. Often in the original integral, C\mathscr{C} is given as a circle with radius rr, and when substituting, the integration interval becomes [0,2π][0,2\pi]. After substituting and applying the ML Lemma, one should use 2π2 \pi, the length of the new integration interval, not 2πr2\pi r, the original circle’s circumference. In other words, it’s important to remember that you must apply the ML Lemma to the new curve (segment), C\mathscr{C} ' , that emerges through substitution.


  1. Osborne (1999). Complex variables and their applications: p76. ↩︎