logo

Main Ideals 📂Abstract Algebra

Main Ideals

Definition 1

A principal ideal is generated by an element aa with unity in a commutative ring RR.


  • The identity element for multiplication 11 is called the unity.

Description

Although the notation <a>:={rar R}\left< a \right> := \left\{ r a \mid r\ \in R \right\} is similar to that of a cyclic group, it actually forms a slightly larger structure.

For example, all ideals nZ=<n>={,2n,n,0,n,2n,}n \mathbb{Z} = \left< n \right> = \left\{ \cdots , -2n , -n , 0 , n , 2n , \cdots \right\} of Z\mathbb{Z} are principal ideals.

At first encounter, principal ideals might feel abstract and seemingly useless, but they become valuable when discussing integral domains with good properties. Among the following theorems, especially [2] and [3] act as bridges to PID and UFD, respectively, so it’s recommended to prove them by hand at least once.

Theorems

For a field FF, let’s say p(x),r(x),s(x)F[x]p(x), r(x), s(x) \in F [ x ].

  1. All ideals of F[x]F [ x ] are principal ideals.
  2. If <p(x)>{0}\left< p(x) \right> \ne \left\{ 0 \right\} is a maximal ideal     \iff p(x)p(x) then p(x)p(x) is an irreducible element over FF
  3. If an irreducible element p(x)p(x) over FF divides r(x)s(x)r(x) s(x) then p(x)p(x) divides r(x)r(x) or s(x)s(x).

Proof

[1]

Consider the polynomial g(x)g(x) of lowest degree in the ideal N{0}N \ne \left\{ 0 \right\} of F[x]F [ x ].


Case 1. degg=0\deg g = 0

Since g(x)g(x) is a constant function, it equals g(x)Fg(x) \in F, and assuming FF to be a field, g(x)g(x) is a unit in both FF and F[x]F [ x ]. As g(x)g(x) is a unit of F[x]F [ x ], NN is a principal ideal.


Case 2. degg1\deg g \ge 1

Any f(x)Nf(x) \in N can be expressed as f(x)=g(x)q(x)+r(x)f(x) = g(x) q(x) + r(x) according to the division algorithm. Since NN is an ideal, f(x)g(x)q(x)=r(x)N f(x) - g(x) q(x) = r(x) \in N and the lowest degree polynomial is g(x)g(x), then r(x)=0r(x)=0 must be true.


Hence, any f(x)Nf(x) \in N can always be expressed as f(x)=g(x)q(x)f(x) = g(x) q(x), making N=<g(x)>N = \left< g(x) \right> true, and thus NN is a principal ideal.

[2]

(    )( \implies )

Let’s assume p(x)p(x) is not an irreducible element and is factorized as p(x)=f(x)g(x)p(x) = f(x) g(x).

Since <p(x)>\left< p(x) \right> is a maximal ideal of F[x]F [ x ], then <p(x)>F[x]\left< p(x) \right> \ne F [ x ] and p(x)Fp(x) \notin F. A maximal ideal is a prime ideal, so if (f(x)g(x))<p(x)>\left( f(x) g(x) \right) \in \left< p(x) \right>, then either f(x)<p(x)>f(x) \in \left< p(x) \right> or g(x)<p(x)>g(x) \in \left< p(x) \right> must be true. However, the degrees of f(x)f(x) and g(x)g(x) cannot be less than that of p(x)p(x), contradicting our assumption, so p(x)p(x) is an irreducible element over FF.

(    )( \impliedby )

Suppose that <p(x)>\left< p(x) \right> is not a maximal ideal, and there exists an ideal NN satisfying <p(x)>NF[x]\left< p(x) \right> \subsetneq N \subsetneq F [ x ].

According to theorem [1], NN is a principal ideal of F[x]F [ x ], thus for some g(x)F[x]g(x) \in F [ x ], we can set N:=<g(x)>N := \left< g(x) \right>. Since <p(x)>N\left< p(x) \right> \subset N from our assumption, for some q(x)F[x]q(x) \in F [ x ] we have p(x)=g(x)q(x) p(x) = g(x) q(x) But since p(x)p(x) is an irreducible element over FF, either g(x)g(x) or q(x)q(x) must be a constant.

  • If g(x)g(x) is a constant, then g(x)g(x) is a unit of F[x]F [ x ], hence N=F[x]N = F [ x ].
  • If q(x)q(x) is a constant, for some cF[x]c \in F [ x ] we have g(x)=1cp(x)\displaystyle g(x) = {{1} \over {c}} p(x), so N=<g(x)>=<p(x)> N = \left< g(x) \right> = \left< p(x) \right>

Whether g(x)g(x) or q(x)q(x) is constant, it contradicts our assumption, thus <p(x)>\left< p(x) \right> is a principal ideal of F[x]F [ x ].

[3]

If p(x)p(x) divides r(x)s(x)r(x) s(x), then r(x)s(x)<p(x)>r(x) s(x) \in \left< p(x) \right>. But as p(x)p(x) is an irreducible element over FF, by theorem [2], <p(x)>\left< p(x) \right> is a maximal ideal and thus a prime ideal.

Thus if r(x)s(x)<p(x)>r(x) s(x) \in \left< p(x) \right>, then either r(x)<p(x)>r(x) \in \left< p(x) \right> or s(x)<p(x)>s(x) \in \left< p(x) \right>, meaning p(x)p(x) divides r(x)r(x) or s(x)s(x).


  1. Fraleigh. (2003). A first course in abstract algebra(7th Edition): p250. ↩︎