Lp Spaces, Lebesgue Spaces
📂Lebesgue SpacesLp Spaces, Lebesgue Spaces
Definition
Let Ω⊂Rn be an open set, and p be a positive real number.
For all measurable functions f defined on Ω, define set Lp(Ω) as follows.
Lp(Ω):={f:∫Ω∣f(x)∣pdx<∞}
This is called the Lp space or Lebesgue space and is briefly denoted as Lp. Typically, textbooks on functional analysis describe it as above, while measure theory and real analysis textbooks describe it as follows.
Given a measure space (X,E,μ), for measurable functions f defined on X, define set Lp(X,E,μ) as follows.
Lp(X,E,μ):={f:∫∣f∣pdμ<∞}
Here, μ is the measure. It is simply denoted as Lp(μ),Lp(X) and so on.
Properties
- Lp is a vector space.
- For 1≤p≤∞, Lp is a normed space.
- Lp is a complete space.
- For E⊂X, if 1≤p≤q≤∞ and μ(E)<∞⟹Lq(E)⊂Lp(E)
Explanation
2. If p<1, then ∥⋅∥p does not satisfy the triangle inequality and is not a norm. However, if p=∞, then Lp space becomes a normed space.
A complete normed vector space is specifically called a Banach space. Therefore, Lp space is a Banach space. Lp is especially important as a space where the Hölder inequality and the Minkowski inequality hold.
A vector space on which an inner product is defined is called an inner product space. A complete inner product space is specifically called a Hilbert space. For L2 space, an inner product can be defined as follows.
(∫∣f(x)∣2dx)21=(∫f(x)f(x)dx)21=⟨f,f⟩21
Therefore, L2 space is a Hilbert space.
4. Let’s focus on the condition μ(E)<∞. If the integration range is not bounded, then L1(E) and L2(E) do not have any inclusion relation. For certain conditions that 1≤p<q<r meets, u∈Lp∩Lr⟹u∈Lq can also be satisfied.
Proof
2.
For 1≤p<∞, define ∥⋅∥p as follows.
∥f∥p:=(∫Ω∣f(x)∣pdx)1/p,f∈Lp(Ω)
Then ∥⋅∥p becomes the norm of Lp space. (When 0<p<1, it does not become a norm.) It is obvious that ∥f∥p≥0, and it is also obvious that ∥f∥p=0⟺f=0. It can also be shown that for c∈C, ∥cf∥p=∣c∣∥f∥p holds as follows.
∥cf∥p====(∫Ω∣cf(x)∣pdx)1/p(∣c∣p∫Ω∣f(x)∣pdx)1/p∣c∣(∫Ω∣f(x)∣pdx)1/p∣c∣∥f∥p
For f,g∈Lp, ∥f+g∥p≤∥f∥p+∥g∥p also holds, and this is known as the Minkowski inequality.
■
3.
Strategy: Almost everything is solved by Fatou’s lemma.
Given a Cauchy sequence fn, a subsequence fnk that satisfies ∥fn−fnk∥p<2k1 can be found. For all k∈N,
gk:=g:=i=1∑k∣fni+1−fni∣k→∞limgk=i=1∑∞∣fni+1−fni∣
by defining it, the triangle inequality provides
∥gk∥p≤i∑k2i1<1
Fatou’s Lemma
For a sequence of non-negative measurable functions {fn},
∫(n→∞liminffn)dμ≤n→∞liminf∫fndμ
According to Fatou’s lemma,
∥g∥pp≤∫n→∞limgkpdμ≤k→∞liminf∫gkpdμ≤1
Since g is finite almost everywhere,
fnk=fn1(x)+i=1∑k[fni(x)−fni−1(x)]
converges almost everywhere. If we define f:=k→∞limfnk, then by Fatou’s lemma,
∥f−fm∥p=∫∣f−fm∣pdμ≤k→∞liminf∫∣fnk−fm∣pdμ≤εp
Therefore, f−fm∈Lp and f=fm+(f−fm)∈Lp. Since every Cauchy sequence in Lp converges to an element in Lp, Lp is a complete space.
■
4.
Strategy: Showing the inequality ∣f(x)∣p≤1+∣f(x)∣q is sufficient; the rest follows from the properties of Lebesgue integration.
Let’s assume f∈Lq. Then the following equation holds.
∣f(x)∣≤1⟹1≤∣f(x)∣⟹∣f(x)∣p≤1∣f(x)∣p≤∣f(x)∣q
Hence, whether ∣f(x)∣ is larger or smaller than 1, the following holds.
∣f(x)∣p≤1+∣f(x)∣q
Taking the Lebesgue integral ∫Edμ results in
∫E∣f∣pdμ≤∫E1dμ+∫E∣f∣qdμ=m(E)+∫E∣f∣qdμ<∞
Since m(E)<∞ and ∫E∣f∣qdμ<∞, the following holds.
∫E∣f∣pdμ<∞
In other words, since f∈Lq⟹f∈Lp,
Lq(E)⊂Lp(E)
■
See Also