logo

Finding the Equivalent Resistance of Parallel Circuits Easily 📂Physics

Finding the Equivalent Resistance of Parallel Circuits Easily

Buildup

20180705_225525.png

Imagine calculating the equivalent resistance of the circuit shown above. Of course, if we change it into a parallel circuit like below, we can find the answer through the formula.

20180705_225533.png

When there are nn resistors, the formula for resistance in parallel is 1R=1R1+1R2++1Rn\displaystyle {{1} \over {R}} = {{1} \over {R_{1}}} + {{1} \over {R_{2}}} + \cdots + {{1} \over {R_{n}}}. Substituting the resistors into the formula gives us

1R=12+15+15=12+25=510+410=910 \begin{align*} {{1} \over {R}} =& {{1} \over {2}} + {{1} \over {5}} + {{1} \over {5}} \\ =& {{1} \over {2}} + {{2} \over {5}} \\ =& {{5} \over {10}} + {{4} \over {10}} \\ =& {{9} \over {10}} \end{align*}

Therefore, the equivalent resistance is the reciprocal of 1/R1/R, which is R=109\displaystyle R = {{10} \over {9}}.

The problem is that this standard solution is unexpectedly difficult and involves a lot of calculations. It’s almost obvious because it’s the addition of fractions, so there are a lot of minor multiplications and the results also come out in reciprocal form during the process of finding a common denominator. If you see a mistake in a resistance problem, it’s usually because you either made an unbelievable mistake in addition or forgot to take the reciprocal at the end. As physics progresses with the grade level, it becomes a race of how quickly you can calculate within a given time, and thus parallel resistance can inevitably become a burden. It’s not that you get it wrong because you don’t know the equivalent resistance; it’s because you rush due to impatience, leading to more mistakes. Here, a method is introduced that can solve it easier and quicker, or at least with fewer mistakes. This method can be used primarily because most resistors are given as natural numbers in high school and below. It might not work everywhere, but that’s exactly why it decisively solves the problems that can be solved.

Tips

20180705_225548.png

The least common multiple of 22 and 55 is 1010, and 2Ω2 \Omega can be seen as 10Ω10 \Omega ohm resistors connected in parallel 55 times. Similarly, 5Ω5 \Omega can be seen as 10Ω10 \Omega ohm resistors connected in parallel 22 times. Since both 2Ω2 \Omega and 5Ω5 \Omega are changed to 10Ω10 \Omega, the calculation ends simply by dividing by the number of 10Ω10 \Omega. In fact, the number of 10Ω10 \Omega is 99, and the equivalent resistance calculated in this manner is 109\displaystyle {{10} \over {9}}. As the problem of calculating fractions turns into the problem of finding the least common multiple and simply counting numbers, the solution becomes faster and checking the answer is easier. Strictly speaking, this kind of calculation is already included in the parallel resistance formula, but a few minor steps are skipped to increase speed.

Examples

[1]

Calculate the parallel resistance of 2Ω2 \Omega, 3Ω3 \Omega, 7Ω7 \Omega.

Solution

  • The least common multiple of the resistors is 42Ω42 \Omega.
  • 2Ω2 \Omega, 3Ω3 \Omega, 7Ω7 \Omega are equivalent to having 42Ω42 \Omega parallel-connected 2121 times, 1414 times, 66 times, respectively.
  • Therefore, the parallel resistance is R=4221+14+6=4241\displaystyle R = {{42} \over {21 +14 +6 }} = {{42} \over {41}}

[2]

Calculate the parallel resistance of 3Ω3 \Omega, 6Ω6 \Omega, 10Ω10 \Omega.

Solution

  • The least common multiple of the resistors is 30Ω30 \Omega.
  • 3Ω3 \Omega, 6Ω6 \Omega, 10Ω10 \Omega are equivalent to having 30Ω30 \Omega parallel-connected 1010 times, 55 times, 33 times, respectively.
  • Therefore, the parallel resistance is R=3010+5+3=53\displaystyle R = {{30} \over {10 +5 + 3 }} = {{5} \over {3}}