logo

Lebesgue Integration 📂Measure Theory

Lebesgue Integration

Build-up

Before considering the generalization of the Riemann integral, it is necessary to define a simple function.

Assume that the function values are non-negative and the codomain of ϕ:RR\phi : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} is a finite set {a1,a2,,an}\left\{ a_{1} , a_{2}, \cdots , a_{n} \right\}. If Ai=ϕ1({ai})MA_{i} = \phi^{-1} \left( \left\{ a_{i} \right\} \right) \in \mathcal{M} satisfies, then ϕ\phi is called a simple function. Simple functions have the following properties:

  • (i): If iji \ne j, then AiAj=A_{i } \cap A_{j} = \emptyset
  • (ii): k=1nAk=R\displaystyle \bigsqcup_{k=1}^{n} A_{k} = \mathbb{R}
  • (iii): ϕ(x)=k=1nak1Ak(x)\displaystyle \phi (x) = \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_{k} \mathbb{1}_{A_{k}}(x) is a measurable function.

Here, 1A\mathbb{1}_{A} represents the indicator function.

Simple functions are inherently composed of three very manageable elements. Firstly, since the function values are non-negative, there is no need to consider the sign. Secondly, they are finite, allowing for free addition and subtraction. Thirdly, they are measurable. While the term simple is used in various ways across different fields of mathematics, in real analysis, it can certainly be considered the opposite of ‘complex.’ After defining such manageable and convenient simple functions, one can immediately think of a new integration that covers the Riemann integral.

Definition and Basic Properties

Lebesgue Integral of Simple Functions

When ϕ\phi is a simple function and EME \in \mathcal{M}, the following is called the Lebesgue integral of the simple function ϕ\phi.

Eϕdm:=k=1nakm(AkE) \int_{E} \phi dm := \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_{k} m (A_{k} \cap E)

The Lebesgue integral of a simple function possesses the following properties:

  • [1]: For all a>0a>0, Eaϕdm=aEϕdm\displaystyle \int_{E} a \phi dm = a \int_{E} \phi dm
  • [2]: For two simple functions ϕ,ψ\phi , \psi, if ϕψ\phi \le \psi, then EϕdmEψdm\displaystyle \int_{E} \phi dm \le \int_{E} \psi dm
  • [3]: If A,BMA, B \in \mathcal{M} and AB=A \cap B = \emptyset, then ABϕdm=Aϕdm+Bϕdm\displaystyle \int_{A \cup B} \phi dm = \int_{A} \phi dm + \int_{B} \phi dm

Here, mm denotes the Lebesgue measure. The condition of being a simple function is so strong and specific that it cannot be utilized in many places. By incorporating the idea of the partition method, a satisfactory ‘Lebesgue integral’ is formulated.

Lebesgue Integral of Measurable Functions 1

When ϕ\phi is a simple function, and for the non-negative measurable function ff and EME \in \mathcal{M}, the following is termed the Lebesgue integral of the measurable function ff. Efdm:=sup{Eϕdm  0ϕf}\int_{E} f dm := \sup \left\{ \left. \int_{E} \phi dm \ \right| \ 0 \le \phi \le f \right\}

The Lebesgue integral of a measurable function is characterized by these properties:

  • [1]’: For all r0r \ge 0, Erfdm=rEfdm\displaystyle \int_{E} r f dm = r \int_{E} f dm
  • [2]’: For two measurable functions f,gf, g, if fgf \le g, then EfdmEgdm\displaystyle \int_{E} f dm \le \int_{E} g dm
  • [3]’: If A,BMA, B \in \mathcal{M} and AB=A \cap B = \emptyset, then ABfdm=Afdm+Bfdm\displaystyle \int_{A \cup B} f dm = \int_{A} f dm + \int_{B} f dm
  • [4]’: If A,BMA, B \in \mathcal{M} and ABA \subset B, then AfdmBfdm\displaystyle \int_{A} f dm \le \int_{B} f dm
  • [5]’: If NNN \in \mathcal{N}, then Nfdm=0\displaystyle \int_{N} f dm = 0
  • [6]’: m(E)infEfEfdmm(E)supEf\displaystyle m(E) \inf_{E} f \le \int_{E} f dm \le m(E) \sup_{E} f

Besides these basic properties, the following widely utilized theorem is introduced.

Theorem

For the measurable space (X,E)( X , \mathcal{E} ) and the measurable function f0f \ge 0 and all measurable sets AEA \in \mathcal{E}, Afdm=0    f=0 a.e. \int_{A} f dm = 0 \iff f = 0 \text{ a.e.} Here, a.e.\text{a.e.} signifies almost everywhere.

Proof

(    )( \implies )

For E:=f1(0,)E := f^{-1} ( 0 , \infty), if m(E)=0m(E) = 0, ff is almost everywhere f=0f=0. For proof, assume En:=f1[1n,)\displaystyle E_{n} := f^{-1} \left[ {{1} \over {n}} , \infty \right), then E=n=1En\displaystyle E = \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} E_{n} and limnEn=E\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty} E_{n} = E hold true. Considering the simple function ϕn:=1n1Enf\displaystyle \phi_{n} := {{1}\over {n}} \mathbb{1}_{E_{n}} \le f, 1nm(En)=AϕndmAfdm=0 {{1}\over {n}} m( E_{n} ) = \int_{A} \phi_{n} dm \le \int_{A} f dm = 0 therefore 1nm(En)0 {{1} \over {n}} m(E_{n}) \le 0 that is, for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}, m(En)=0m(E_{n}) = 0 holds.

[7]: EnME_{n} \in \mathcal{M}, EnEn+1    m(n=1En)=limnm(En)\displaystyle E_{n} \subset E_{n+1} \implies m \left( \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} E_{n} \right) = \lim_{n \to \infty} m (E_{n})

Meanwhile, since EnEn+1E_{n} \subset E_{n+1}, the following holds. m(n=1En)=limnm(En)=m(E)=0 m \left( \bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} E_{n} \right) = \lim_{n \to \infty} m (E_{n}) = m(E) = 0


(    )( \impliedby )

Since ff is almost everywhere f=0f=0 and the simple function ϕ\phi satisfies 0ϕf0 \le \phi \le f, ϕ\phi is also almost everywhere ϕ=0\phi = 0. Hence, Afdm=0\displaystyle \int_{A} f dm = 0.


  1. Capinski. (1999). Measure, Integral and Probability: p77. ↩︎