logo

Properties of Subspaces in Connected Spaces 📂Topology

Properties of Subspaces in Connected Spaces

Theorem

Let’s say about a topological space XX that YXY \subset X.

  • [1]: If YY is a connected space, then Y\overline{Y} is also a connected space.
  • [2]: That YY is a disconnected space is equivalent to the existence of open sets UU and VV in XX that satisfy UYVYUVY=YUV U \cap Y \ne \emptyset \\ V \cap Y \ne \emptyset \\ U \cap V \cap Y = \emptyset \\ Y \subset U \cup V .
  • [3]: For a set {Aα  α}\left\{ A_{\alpha} \ | \ \alpha \in \forall \right\} of connected subspaces of XX, if αAα \bigcap_{\alpha \in \forall} A_{\alpha} \ne \emptyset then αAα\displaystyle \bigcup_{\alpha \in \forall} A_{\alpha} is a connected space.
  • [4]: For a sequence {An  nN}\left\{ A_{n} \ | \ n \in \mathbb{N} \right\} of connected subspaces of XX, if An(i=1n1Ai) A_{n} \cap \left( \bigcup_{i=1}^{n-1} A_{i} \right) \ne \emptyset then n=1An\displaystyle \bigcup_{n = 1}^{\infty} A_{n} is a connected space.

Explanation

[2]

It’s good to visualize it because it’s long and hard to imagine.

20180308\_144911.png

Here Y=Y1Y2Y = Y_{1} \cup Y_{2}. No matter how much you’ve studied topology, it’s not easy to imagine such a separated shape when you just say a subset. Instead of memorizing it as text, it’s better to accept the definition of disconnection as a fact.

[3]

The condition αAα\displaystyle \bigcap_{\alpha \in \forall} A_{\alpha} \ne \emptyset implies that at least one point is connecting everything. It may help to imagine pinning several cloths to the wall with a nail.

[4]

The condition An(i=1n1Ai)\displaystyle A_{n} \cap \left( \bigcup_{i=1}^{n-1} A_{i} \right) \ne \emptyset means the subspaces are connected in some way, even if indirectly. Think of it as an image where not every link in a chain is connected, but the overall structure is connected. Interpret it as a relaxation of the condition of the set itself in lieu of the given set in the statement [3], which is limited to countable sets.

By the way, statements [3] and [4] also hold true if ‘connected’ is replaced with ‘path-connected’.

Proof

[1]

Assume Y\overline{Y} is a disconnected space.

If XX is a disconnected space, there exists a surjective continuous function f:X{a,b}f : X \to \left\{ a, b \right\} for a discrete space {a,b}\left\{ a, b \right\}.

Then, there exists a surjective and continuous function f:Y{a,b}f : \overline{Y} \to \left\{ a, b \right\}. Consider fY:Y{a,b}f|_{Y} : Y \to \left\{ a, b \right\}, which limits the domain of this function to YY.

For a connected space XX, if f:XYf : X \to Y is a surjective continuous function, then YY is a connected space.

Since a discrete space {a,b}\left\{ a, b \right\} is not a connected space, by contraposition, either YY is a disconnected space, or fYf|_{Y} is not surjective or not continuous. However, since YY is a connected space by premise and fYf|_{Y} remains continuous, fYf|_{Y} must not be surjective.

[If ff is continuous, for all AXA \subset X, f(A)f(A)f( \overline{A} ) \subset \overline{ f(A) } ](../432)

That is, either f(Y)={a}f(Y) = \left\{ a \right\} or f(Y)={b}f(Y) = \left\{ b \right\}, but since ff is continuous, f(Y)f(Y){a,b}f( \overline{Y}) \subset \overline{ f(Y) } \ne \left\{ a , b \right\}. This contradicts with ff being surjective, therefore, Y\overline{Y} must be a connected space.

Meanwhile, the following useful corollary can be obtained:

If a subspace YY of a topological space XX is a connected space, then ZZ satisfying YZYY \subset Z \subset \overline{Y} is a connected space.

[2]

()(\Rightarrow)

Since YY is a disconnected space, non-empty open spaces A,BA , B exist in YY that satisfy AB=A \cap B = \emptyset and AB=YA \cup B = Y. Because AA and BB are open spaces, UY=AVY=B U \cap Y =A \\ V \cap Y = B an open space U,VU, V exists in XX. Therefore, UYVYUVY=(UY)(VY)=AB= U \cap Y \ne \emptyset \\ V \cap Y \ne \emptyset \\ U \cap V \cap Y = (U \cap Y) \cap (V \cap Y) = A \cap B = \emptyset Meanwhile, Y=ABUVY = A \cup B \subset U \cup V.


()(\Leftarrow)

Assuming open sets UU and VV exist in XX satisfying UYVYUVY=YUV U \cap Y \ne \emptyset \\ V \cap Y \ne \emptyset \\ U \cap V \cap Y = \emptyset \\ Y \subset U \cup V , and if A:=UYB:=VY A := U \cap Y \\ B := V \cap Y , then A,BA, B is a non-empty open set in YY. Meanwhile, AB=(UY)(VY)=UVY=AB=(UY)(VY)=(UV)Y=Y A \cap B = (U \cap Y) \cap ( V \cap Y) = U \cap V \cap Y = \emptyset \\ A \cup B = (U \cap Y) \cup (V \cap Y) = ( U \cup V ) \cap Y = Y Therefore, YY is a disconnected space.

[3]

Assuming αAα\displaystyle \bigcap_{\alpha \in \forall} A_{\alpha} \ne \emptyset, let’s assume Y=αAαY = \displaystyle \bigcup_{\alpha \in \forall} A_{\alpha} is a disconnected space. By statement [2], UYVYUVY=YUV U \cap Y \ne \emptyset \\ V \cap Y \ne \emptyset \\ U \cap V \cap Y = \emptyset \\ Y \subset U \cup V open sets UU and VV exist in XX. Then, (UAα)(VAα)=(UV)Aα=Aα(UAα)(VAα)=(UV)Aα= (U \cap A_{\alpha} ) \cup (V \cap A_{\alpha} ) = (U \cup V) \cap A_{\alpha} = A_{\alpha} \\ (U \cap A_{\alpha} ) \cap (V \cap A_{\alpha} ) = ( U \cap V) \cap A_{\alpha} = \emptyset However, since AαA_{\alpha} is assumed to be a connected space, either (UAα)(U \cap A_{\alpha} ) or (VAα)(V \cap A_{\alpha} ) must be empty. It doesn’t matter whether it’s UU or VV, so let’s just say (VAα)=(V \cap A_{\alpha} ) = \emptyset. For any AαA_{\alpha}, (VAα)=(V \cap A_{\alpha} ) = \emptyset so, VαAα= V \cap \bigcap_{\alpha \in \forall} A_{\alpha} = \emptyset To put it clearly, VY=V \cap Y = \emptyset, which contradicts the assumption.

[4]

Let’s say n2n \le 2 for a natural number.

Since A1A_{1} is a connected space, B2B_{2} is also a connected space, and by mathematical induction, BnB_{n} is a connected space. A2A1A1Bn1Bn \emptyset \ne A_{2} \cap A_{1} \subset A_{1} \subset B_{n-1} \subset B_{n} therefore, n=2Bn \bigcap_{n=2}^{\infty} B_{n} \ne \emptyset By statement [3], n=1An=n=2Bn\displaystyle \bigcup_{n = 1}^{\infty} A_{n} = \bigcup_{n = 2}^{\infty} B_{n} is a connected space.