logo

Continuous in Topology 📂Topology

Continuous in Topology

Definition

For a topological space (X,TX)(X, \mathscr{T}_{X} ) and (Y,TY)(Y, \mathscr{T}_{Y} ), let’s denote by f:XYf: X \to Y. A function ff is said to be continuous at aa if, for every neighborhood VTYV \in \mathscr{T}_{Y} containing f(a)f(a), there exists a neighborhood UTXU \in \mathscr{T}_{X} containing aa such that f(U)Vf(U) \subset V is satisfied. If ff is continuous at every point of XX, it is called a continuous function and can be represented as fC(X,Y)f \in C(X,Y).

Explanation

At first glance, this definition might seem difficult to grasp, but upon closer examination, it is essentially the same concept as defining continuity in analysis, where for every given ϵ>0\epsilon > 0, there exists an δ\delta satisfying xa<δ    f(x)f(a)<ϵ\left| x - a \right| \lt \delta \implies \left| f(x) - f(a) \right| \lt \epsilon. Noting that {x:xa<δ}\left\{ x : \left| x - a \right| \lt \delta \right\} and {f(x):f(x)f(a)<ϵ}\left\{ f(x) : \left| f(x) - f(a) \right| \lt \epsilon \right\} are open sets, the idea that for every given ϵ\epsilon, an δ\delta can be found translates to being able to find an open set satisfying the condition in XX for every open set given in YY.

It’s worth noting that C(X,Y)C(X,Y) represents the set of continuous functions with domain XX and codomain YY. For those studying topology, the epsilon-delta argument is probably well-tread territory, making formulas and symbols more comfortable than text.

Continuity has been generalized from the Euclidean space to metric spaces, and now beyond metric spaces to topological spaces. If the discussion of continuity in analysis is primarily for the sake of differentiation, in topology, the concept of continuity is necessary to discuss homeomorphisms.

Below are various equivalent conditions for continuous points and continuous functions. Since these are equivalent conditions, they can sometimes be used as definitions depending on the textbook.

Equivalent Conditions for Continuous Points

If we denote by aXa \in X, the following propositions are equivalent:

  • (1): f:XYf : X \to Y is continuous at aa.
  • (2): For every neighborhood VTYV \in \mathscr{T}_{Y} containing f(a)f(a), there exists a neighborhood UTX U \in \mathscr{T}_{X} satisfying aUf1(V)a \in U \subset f^{-1} (V).
  • (3): For every N(f(a))\mathcal{N} ( f(a) ), f1(N(f(a)))f^{-1} ( \mathcal{N} ( f(a) ) ) is a neighborhood of aa.
  • (4): For all VYV \subset Y satisfying f(a)Vf(a) \in V^{\circ}, a(f1(V))a \in (f^{-1} (V))^{\circ} holds.

It’s worth mentioning that N(a)\mathcal{N} (a) is an open set in XX containing aa, known as the neighborhood of aa.

Equivalent Conditions for Continuous Functions

The following propositions are equivalent:

  • [1]: f:XYf : X \to Y is a continuous function.
  • [2]: For every neighborhood VTYV \in \mathscr{T}_{Y} containing f(a)f(a) and every point af1(V)a \in f^{-1} (V), there exists a neighborhood UaTX U_{a} \in \mathscr{T}_{X} satisfying aUaf1(V)a \in U_{a} \subset f^{-1} (V).
  • [3]: For every open set VYV \subset Y, f1(V)f^{-1} (V) is an open set in XX1.
  • [4]: For every closed set CYC \subset Y, f1(C)f^{-1} (C) is a closed set in XX.
  • [5]: For every AXA \subset X, f(A)f(A)f( \overline{A} ) \subset \overline{ f(A) } holds.
  • [6]: For every BBB \in \mathscr{B}, there exists a basis B\mathscr{B} of TY\mathscr{T}_{Y} satisfying f1(B)TXf^{-1} (B) \in \mathscr{T}_{X}.
  • [7]: For every SSS \in \mathscr{S}, there exists a sub-basis S\mathscr{S} of TY\mathscr{T}_{Y} satisfying f1(S)TXf^{-1} (S) \in \mathscr{T}_{X}.
  • [8]: Composition of continuous functions: If f:XYf : X \to Y and g:YZg : Y \to Z are continuous functions, then the composite function gf:XZg \circ f : X \to Z is also continuous.

Another Definition of Continuous Functions

Especially, ‘Theorem [3]: For every open set VYV \subset Y, f1(V)f^{-1} (V) is an open set in XX’ is frequently used and often serves as the definition of continuous functions. While it’s not necessary to memorize all listed conditions, it’s crucial to remember [3] and be able to apply it readily.


  1. Munkres. (2000). Topology(2nd Edition): p102. ↩︎