The First Countable and the Second Countable
Definition 1
Let’s suppose that a topological space is given.
- If every point has a countable local base, it is called a first-countable space.
- If has a countable base, it is called a second-countable space.
Explanation
Through the concepts of base and local base, a new branch of countability has been created.
Examples of spaces not being first-countable
Discrete spaces are not first-countable, and needless to say, they are not second-countable either.
Intuitive Understanding
Although not an accurate explanation, one can understand the first-countability as the feeling that at every point, there exists a countable number of open sets. On the other hand, the second-countability conveys a sense that a countable set encompasses the whole, closely related to the concept of separability. First-countability and second-countability are not mutually exclusive contrary to first-category & second-category and have an inclusion relationship. This can be readily verified by considering the relationship between a base and a local base. Moreover, as previously mentioned, second-countability not only resembles the concept of separability but in fact, it can also be shown to embody true separability.
Theorem
- [1]: Every second-countable space is a first-countable space.
- [2]: Every second-countable space is separable.
Proof
Every second-countable space is first-countable
If is a second-countable space, then will have a countable base .
Relationship between base and local base: If is a base for , then is a local base for .
Since is countable for all , is first-countable.
■
Every second-countable space is separable
Suppose is a second-countable space that has a countable base . For every non-empty set , let’s choose and define . Since is constructed by selecting elements from the countable base , is also countable, and proving concludes the proof.
Let’s say is an open set that contains .
Since is a base for , there exists satisfying . Since and , we have . As mentioned earlier, since , still holds. By the definition of a limit point, is a limit point of , and since , holds. Of course, since , to satisfy both conditions, it must be that .
■
Munkres. (2000). Topology(2nd Edition): p190. ↩︎