logo

Proof of the Anderson-Livingston Theorem 📂Graph Theory

Proof of the Anderson-Livingston Theorem

Theorem 1

RR If a commutative ring has a unity 11 and the set of its zero divisors is denoted as Z(R)Z(R), then its zero divisor graph Γ(R)\Gamma (R) is a connected graph and diam(Γ(R))3\text{diam}(\Gamma (R)) \le 3


Explanation

Anderson and Livingstone have made significant contributions to the study of zero divisor graphs, particularly this theorem that specifies the upper limit of graph connectivity and diameter, which is also referred to as the Anderson-Livingstone Theorem.

Proof

Let x,yZ(R)(xy)x,y \in Z(R) (x \ne y).

  • Case 1. xy=0xy=0
    Trivially, d(x,y)=1d(x,y)=1.
  • Case 2. xy0xy \ne 0
    • Case 2-1. x2=y2=0x^2 = y^2 = 0
      1.png Hence, d(x,y)=2d(x,y)=2
    • Case 2-2. x2=0,y20x^2 = 0, y^2 \ne 0
      There exists a bZ(R)b \in Z(R) such that by=0by=0.
      • Case 2-2-1. bx=0bx=0
        2.png Hence, d(x,y)=2d(x,y)=2
      • Case 2-2-2. bx0bx \ne 0
        3.png Hence, d(x,y)=2d(x,y)=2
    • Case 2-3. x20,y2=0x^2 \ne 0, y^2 = 0
      Similar to Case 2-2.
    • Case 2-4. x20,y20x^2 \ne 0, y^2 \ne 0
      There exists a a,bZ(R)a, b \in Z(R) such that ax=0=byax=0=by.
      • Case 2-4-1. a=ba=b
        4.png Since ax=0=ayax=0=ay, d(x,y)=2d(x,y)=2
      • Case 2-4-2. aba \ne b
        • Case 2-4-2-1. ab=0ab=0
          5.png Hence, d(x,y)=3d(x,y)=3
        • Case 2-4-2-2. ab0ab \ne 0
          6.png Hence, d(x,y)=2d(x,y)=2


  1. Anderson, Livingston. (1999). The Zero-Divisor Graph of a Commutative Ring ↩︎