Proof of Euler's Representation of the Sinc Function📂Functions
Proof of Euler's Representation of the Sinc Function
Definition
Unnormalized Sinc Function
The following functionsinc:R→R is called the sinc function.
sincx:=⎩⎨⎧xsinx1,if x=0,if x=0
Normalized Sinc Function
sincx:=⎩⎨⎧πxsinπx1,if x=0,if x=0
Theorem
Euler’s Representation
sincx=πxsinπx=n=1∏∞(1−n2x2)
Explanation
A sinc function is a function that divides sinx by x, and it is quite useful since it has its own name. Although not always mentioned by name in textbooks, it often appears in the sections on limits and continuity.
Essentially, the unnormalized and normalized sinc functions are the same, so they are not strictly distinguished. The definition used usually depends on the context.
Strategy: The proof to be introduced is not intuitive and contains many technical parts, making it quite difficult to understand. However, it is relatively more straightforward and has the advantage of not using complex analysis.
Part 1. Even Function r(x) Periodicity
Let the ratio of the sinc function sincx and Euler’s representation f(x):=n=1∏∞(1−n2x2) be a function of x as follows.
r(x):=f(x)sincx
The relationship between sincx and sinc(x+1) is as follows.
sinc(x+1)===π⋅(x+1)sinπ(x+1)πx−sinπxx+1x(−x+1x)⋅sincx
Meanwhile, f(x) and f(x+1) also have the following relationship.
====(−x+1x)f(x)(−x+1x)n=1∏∞(1−n2x2)(−x+1x)(1−x)(2−x)⋯n=2∏∞n21(1+x)(2+x)⋯−(0−x)(1−x)(2−x)⋯n=2∏∞n21(2+x)⋯−f(x+1)
Thus, r(x) is a 1-periodic function, and considering only −1/2<x≤1/2 is sufficient to show that sinc and f are equal. In fact, both sincx and f(x) are even functions and so is r(x) defined by their ratio, making 0<x≤1/2 sufficient.
Part 2. Recurrence Relation (n2−c2)In(c)=(n2−n)In−2(c)
In(c):=∫02πcosntcosctdt
Define it, and then
I0(0)=∫02πcos0dt=2πI0(2x)=∫02πcos2xtdt=[2xsin2xt]02π=2xsinπx
Therefore,
I0(0)I0(2x)=πxsinπx=sincx
Consequently, we need to show
I0(0)I0(2x)=n=1∏∞(1−n2x2)
First, let’s express In(c) as a recurrence relation.
In(c)=======∫02πcosntcosctdt[c1cosntsinct]02π−∫02πc1ncosn−1t(−sint)sinctdtcn∫02πcosn−1tsintsinctdtcn[c1cosn−1tsint(−cosct)]02π−cn∫02πc1{(n−1)cosn−2t(−sin2t)+cosnt}(−cosct)dtc2n∫02π{(n−1)cosn−2t(cos2t−1)+cosnt}cosctdtc2n∫02π{ncosnt−(n−1)cosn−2t}cosctdtc2n{nIn(c)−(n−1)In−2(c)}
Rewriting it neatly, we get the following.
(n2−c2)In(c)=(n2−n)In−2(c)
Dividing each side by the equation obtained by substituting c=0 into the above recurrence relation gives a new recurrence relation
n2(n2−c2)In(0)In(c)=In−2(0)In−2(c)
Repeating in the new recurrence relation until the right side becomes I0(0)I0(c), we obtain
k=1∏m(2k)2(2k)2−c2I2m(0)I2m(c)=I0(0)I0(c)
Substituting c=2x here,
==k=1∏m(2k)2(2k)2−(2x)2I2m(0)I2m(2x)I2m(0)I2m(2x)k=1∏mk2k2−x2I0(0)I0(2x)
Part 3. m→∞limIm(0)Im(2x)=1
Our goal is to show I0(0)I0(2x)=n=1∏∞(1−n2x2), so proving m→∞limIm(0)Im(2x)=1 will complete the proof. Now, consider
Im(2x)=∫02πcosmtcos2xtdt
Since in Part 1 we have shown we can assume only x∈(0,1/2], for t∈[0,1/2] we obtain the following two inequalities.
cos0>cos2xt⟹cos2xt>cos2t⟹Im(0)>Im(2x)Im(2x)>Im+2(0)
Simplified,
Im(0)>Im(2x)>Im+2(0)
Dividing each side by Im(0),
1>Im(0)Im(2x)>Im(0)Im+2(0)
According to the recurrence relation obtained earlier,
(m+2)2Im+2(0)=(m2+3m+2)Im(0)
Thus,
m→∞limIm(0)Im+2(0)=m→∞limm+2m+1=1
According to the Sandwich Theorem, we obtain the following:
πxsinπx=n=1∏∞(1−n2x2)
■
Although the result is highly useful, the proof itself is not something you can memorize and use elsewhere. It is recommended to just acknowledge such a proof exists rather than thoroughly understanding and mastering it step by step.