Let’s say 1<p<∞ and L∈(Lp)∗. Then, (Lp)∗ is the dual of the Lp space. Therefore, for every u∈Lp, there exists a v∈Lp′ that satisfies the following equation.
L(u)=Lv(u)=∫Ωu(x)v(x)dx
Explanation
Note that the case where p=1 is not included.
∥v∥p′=∥L;(Lp)∗∥ satisfies that f:(Lp)∗→Lp′ becomes an isometric mapping. Therefore, since (Lp)∗≅Lp′, Lp′ can be considered as the dual of the Lp space.
At this time, p′ is the conjugate exponent of p. Originally, the representation theorem by Riesz is a theorem that holds for Hilbert spaces. Since the Lp space is not generally a Hilbert space, the representation theorem by Riesz cannot be directly applied. However, the above theorem states that the Lp space also has the properties mentioned in the Riesz representation theorem. To explain the content more clearly, it is as follows.
Let’s say a certain linear functionalL∈(Lp)∗ defined on the Lp space is selected. Then, there exists a unique v∈Lp′ corresponding to it. And it satisfies the following equation.
L(u)=∫u(x)v(x)dx
In other words, the element L of (Lp)∗ space and the element v of Lp′ space are paired so that the value of u substituted into L, which is L(u), and the value obtained by multiplying v(x) by u(x) and integrating it, which is ∫u(x)v(x)dx, are the same. Furthermore, since (Lp)∗ and Lp′ are isometric, it can be thought that the Lp′ space is virtually the dual of the Lp space. Also, since p and p′ are each other’s conjugate exponent, conversely, the Lp space can also be considered virtually the dual of the Lp′ space.
Riesz Representation Theorem
Let’s call X a Hilbert Space. Then the following two statements are equivalent to each other.
(b) For all y∈X, there exists a unique x∈X that satisfies x∗(y)=⟨x,y⟩X. Also, ∣x∗;X∗∣=∣x;X∣. ⟨⋅,⋅⟩X is the inner product defined in X.
The Riesz Representation Theorem explains what relationship exists between X, a Hilbert space, and its dual X∗. In simple terms, given a linear functional x∗∈X∗, there exists a unique x∈X corresponding to it, meaning that the values of x∗(y) and ⟨x,y⟩X are the same for all y∈X.
Auxiliary Theorem
Let 1<p<∞.
(c) If L∈(Lp)∗ and ∣L;(Lp)∗∣=1, there exists a unique w∈Lp satisfying ∥w∥p=L(w)=1.
(d) Conversely, if w∈Lp and ∥w∥p=1, there exists a unique L∈(Lp)∗ satisfying ∣L;(Lp)∗∣=L(w)=1.
Proof
To explain the flow of the proof simply:
∣L∣=1 let’s assume
⟹ By the auxiliary theorem (c), a unique w exists
⟹ By the auxiliary theorem (d), a unique L exists
⟹ The defined v satisfies the same properties as L⟹ Since L is unique, L=Lv applies, and so does the rest of the theorem
Part 1 L=0
If we set v=0, the theorem is satisfied.
Part 2 L=0
Let’s assume that any L satisfies ∣L;(Lp)∗∣=α. Then, by multiplying the constant α1, the norm can be made to be 1, and let’s call α1L again L. Based on this process, we can assume ∣L;(Lp)∗∣=1 without loss of generality. Then, the auxiliary theorem (c) exists a w∈Lp that satisfies the following equation.
∥w∥p=1,L(w)=1
And let’s define v as follows.
v(x)={∣w(x)∣p−2w(x),0,w(x)=0otherwise
Then, it can be seen through the following calculation that it is v∈Lp′.
And let’s define Lv as follows. Demonstrating that it satisfies ∣Lv∣=Lv(w)=1, we aim to show L=Lv.
Lv(u)=∫u(x)v(x)dx,u∈Lp
According to the definition of the norm of Dual Norm,
∣Lv(u)∣≤≤=∫∣u(x)v(x)∣dx∥u∥p∥v∥p′∥v∥p′=1
The second line is due to the Hölder’s inequality, and the last line is valid due to the condition ∥u∥≤1 and (1). Therefore, ∣Lv;(Lp)∗∣=1. Also, it can be confirmed that Lv(w)=1 is satisfied.